Comment Re:Weather Alert (Score 1) 509
I don't deny there are idiots on bikes though.
You're focussing too much on the specific security control. Namely 'remote wipe'. It's not about the ability to specifically remote wipe a phone, it's about the ability for a company to control its data.
What the company actually cares about is: "If a device leaves company premises and gets lost, can we ensure our data doesn't fall into unauthorised hands?". They don't need to be able to remote wipe laptops (although I'm sure there's software out there that can do that) because with full-disk encryption, you know your data is safe. So the fact that my employer can't 'remote wipe' my laptop is a little moot.
In any case, remote-wipe capability has been present in blackberries, which are used heavily by big corporates, for at least the past 7 years. I wouldn't exactly say it was new. What is new is people being surprised that a company wants to extend control of its data when it leaves a company-owned device and enters a personal device. I think it's surprising that people would expect anything different.
There is the concrete defence against libel cases in the UK - be able to prove what you say. Simple.
This isn't correct. Truth is not an absolute defence against libel under UK law (unlike, I believe, the US). You can be successfully sued for libel even if both parties agree that what you said was true.
If you have a procedure with 10 parameters, you probably missed some.