Comment done (Score 3, Informative) 250
NSA Director Says the US Must Secure the Internet
As of 10am EST this morning I have completely secured the Internet. The NSA director and my immediate management have been notified. I closed the ticket.
NSA Director Says the US Must Secure the Internet
As of 10am EST this morning I have completely secured the Internet. The NSA director and my immediate management have been notified. I closed the ticket.
My whole point? We are so caught up in ascribing motives that we can't even argue about the real substance - the legislation itself.
I agree and I blame the comic book industry's irresponsible, apolitical position on the issue. I think more comics should be dedicated to in-depth discussion of new legislation. Who owns the copyright on the character of the Socialistman?
I understand that there are many jobs in IT that seem more attractive than teaching, but surely that goes for maths, or chemistry, or whatever, too.
It doesn't, actually. It is much easier for an "OK" programmer, sysadmin, network admin, etc. working as a teacher in school to find a better paying job in the industry than it is for an "OK" mathematician, chemist, or physicist. Unless you work at the Max Plank Institute for Physics or the Fermilab, chances are most commercial organizations have more IT staff than they do scientists.
You also need to consider what education your teachers received themselves. Physics, math, chemistry have well-established curricula at most colleges. Comp Sci, on the other hand, is still very much work in progress. As every other problem with our education system, low quality of IT education in schools is caused by a combination of factors. I attended school in USSR. I had programming classes and the teacher sucked. In every other respect the school was top-notch. Entry-level teaching positions back in those days paid much better than similar engineering positions.
I think the most important factor is lack of established college programs that teach IT education, as opposed to just IT. Being a brilliant mathematician, for example, doesn't necessarily qualify one as a good math teacher. I consider myself a proficient programmer and sysadmin, but when someone asks me to explain something to them, after a couple of minutes I just want to punch him in the face. So, probably, a teaching career would not be the optimal choice for me.
Internet breaks things sometimes, but in this case they weren't even 'conducting business in Il' any more than a mail order company would by mailing purchases there.
Incidentally, if you run a business that mails purchases to IL, that means you have customers there, ergo, you conduct business in the state. Not a complicated concept.
Let me guess, you feel slighted because you're in an area slighted by the survey?
Let me also make a guess, you don't think you are a moron, do you? From my personal experience of living next to a well-respected university for the past fifteen years - after graduating from that same university - this is just a place were people who think they are smart naturally congregate. The people who are in fact smart prefer to congregate at the Cote d'Azure. Hopefully, one of these days I will finally do something smart that will allow me to sell my house in New Jersey to someone in need of proximity to the academia. And I will settle for groping silicone tits at some Mediterranean resort.
So the only people the current patent system helps, are the big companies and the courts.
Perhaps, but it would appear that the real problem is the incompetent assgobblins holed up in the US Patent and Trademark Orifice. I think a good first step would be to introduce compulsory IQ testing at the USPTO and lay off employees scoring below seventy, confiscating all of their square pegs and round holes. The remaining six patent analysts should be offered early retirement with full benefits and a conciliatory "years of service" plaque.
In Russia, mostly the corruption is not just in the system.
If I was Russia's prime minister, I would hire a recent comp sci grad as my anti-spam adviser. You know, somebody fresh out of college, unburdened with superfluous knowledge; somebody who once read a book about spamming. This way my reputation as a thrifty and ethical bureaucrat would be safe with the Russian tabloids.
Texas won its independence from Mexico
The word "won" has a positive connotation not appropriate in this particular case.
Yet time and time again, the half-spoken, implicit, veiled theory appears: drug companies don't want to cure diseases, they intentionally avoid developing cures, because that would lose them money. Why?
Probably because it makes sense. Most pharmaceutical companies are publicly traded and their primary obligation is to the shareholders and not to the customers. If you can charge a customer fifty grand for one course of chemo treatment for the rest of his life, then what is the incentive to find a cure? It's the process that makes them money, not the end result.
A tearful story usually follows comments like mine: what about all those wonderfully dedicated researchers working for the pharmaceutical companies day and night searching for the cure? Well, I follow the news, so I am sure I will hear if they actually cure cancer.
If you steal your own wallet back from a pickpocket, you're not going to jail.
As you know, when it comes to intellectual property rights, common logic rarely applies. Stranger things have happened.
If all else fails, lower your standards.