Assigning guilt/blame to a group of people based on a characteristic outside of their control tends to do that.

Neckbeard/RTFM culture passively discourage everyone, regardless of gender, from pursuing that career. If you don't believe me, just read a random Linus rant. Lots of encouragement to work elsewhere in every reply.

In before SJW brigade comes in demanding everyone involved apologized.

We need a randomized controlled trial to be sure the procedure is effective.

Most promising EBOLA vaccine currently in human trials was developed in Canada, another single-payer country.

For-profit medicine is indisputably good at generating profit. Various outrageously priced targeted cancer treatments are ample evidence of this.

I would gladly trade money for time, but often in case of TV this is simply not offered in a timely manner.

I realize that it is all about advertising, but where do these outrageous cable fees go? If it is all about advertising, why do cable providers charge substantial fees for channel packages? Clearly, you can show more adds if you let everyone with a cable watch it.

So it must be not that simple.

This isn't dotcom bubble days, if /. can crash a website they are doing something majorly wrong.
 
Now lets proceed to share "up the hill both ways" stories and lament how ACs these days don't know what is good for them.

You could also decrease speed limit to something unreasonable. For example, 15mph and issue tickets at 21mph.

You can also hide a max speed sign behind something, like a bush, and install it in otherwise higher speed zone.

You can also install speed trap on the down-slope road, where drivers would naturally speed up without any conscious input.

You can also offer "early payment" discounts on tickets, where if you pay and plead guilty your fine reduced to the point of not worth the time fighting it.

You can establish a ticket challenge procedure that would conflict with working hours, making it logistically difficult for people to challenge.

You can intentionally mail tickets to old addresses, then rake up late fees and interest.

Oh, all of these happened in one or another municipality at some point in time.

The amber light gets decreased, making intersection less safe. Does it matter what party to this money-grabbing public-private sector collusion actually carried out the work?

>>>You're not even supposed to run the amber, never mind the red.

Incorrect. When you see light turning yellow, you are suppose to stop when it is safe to do so, otherwise proceed through the intersection. If you are a municipality concerned about safety - increase timer on yellow light.

Instead, exact opposite happens - municipality concerned with a budget shortfalls decreases yellow light timer to generate additional red light ticket revenue. As a result, many people slam on the brakes increasing instances of rear-end collisions.

>>>It proves the cameras are working, and people are speeding less.

In before "why won't you think of the children!?".

It does not. It may indicate that problem was overblown in the first place. Also since report focuses on revenue, and no accident rates (possibly because there is zero impact) we can conclude that these were always about revenue-generation.