Comment Re:cryptolocker solution (Score 1) 331
since there is no service level dependency it provides to the Volume Shadow Copy Service.
p.s. it is perfectly viable for a literate individual to not use an antivirus. It is also possible to not use AV on a PC in a corporate environment, but it has its implications. T
I think using the OS supplied security controls the Windows Vista/7/8 family provides: Applocker/SRS, Group Policy, App-V
is preferable to running antivirus in an OR scenario. It's also a lot more complicated.
No, he was putting public keys (not private) into a home directory. Specifically, the user was root which was only possible because a)
/root was exported (via exporting /), b) root squash wasn't enabled. Yes, nfs3 is fundamentally insecure. Any vaguely competent sysadmin knows this and knows to take appropriate precautions.
And what's the appropriate action besides root_squash and proper host access control (/etc/exports,tcp wrappers, firewall, etc
It still doesn't do any real authentication.
All trojans/bots/ransomsware is designed to circumvent antivirus. It is a arms wars between viri and anti-virus. At the moment the viri are winning it
:(.
Well it's a reactive business (hopefully) so that's to be expected.
The use of money is all the advantage there is to having money. -- B. Franklin