Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:sleezeball (Score 1) 190

Where do the major OSS licences forbid you making money?

They don't. You're missing the point. He stole source code from open source applications without attributing it or releasing the source, both of which are required by the license in order to use the source. It was therefore a copyright infringement.

He then made money out of this code which he stole.

Comment But you can turn the status bar back on in FF4 (Score 2) 591

I hate to spoil your rant, but you can turn the status bar back on in FF4.

The trick is in knowing that they now call it the "add-on bar".

In the new menu, go to Firefox -> Options -> Add-on bar. Or press Ctrl+/

The URL preview and download status still won't show in the bar like it used to, but if you want that as well, you can still restore that old behaviour with this addon, as recommend by Mozilla's official knowledgebase.

How's that for configurable?

Comment Re:3.0 ? (Score 2) 293

When I said there won't be any major changes, by the way, I meant no more than there are every single new release.

The kernel changes immensely every release, we just don't notice it because the version number change seems so minor, and because it remains so thoroughly backwards-compatible. But each release of Linux includes probably 20,000 patches.

Comment Re:3.0 ? (Score 1) 293

There won't be any major changes. The only reason to do it would be aesthetic.

For the last few years of releases, the first two digits haven't mattered anyway because they haven't changed, and they have no reason to. Linux 2.6.18 and Linux 2.6.20 are two releases apart, and that's all you need to know, so you might as well call them Linux 18 and Linux 20. By that logic we're now on Linux 39.

The problem with this is that they need a fourth number to represent any minor updates to existing versions, eg 2.6.32.28, which starts to look like a mess.

Hence, I'm sure Linus has been itching to drop some of these digits for a while now. What he's proposing here is to go to 3.0, but have the second digit increment every 6 months, not the third. So a minor update to an upcoming stable version would be like 3.0.4 rather than 2.6.40.4

Comment Re:web 101: don't run unknown javascripts (Score 1) 262

It's 2011. Javascript is not optional for the web anymore.

Javascript is also not the problem. It's insecure server-side code that's the problem. XSS is not a Javascript vulnerability, it's a vulnerability with the server side. Javascript is just an actor, not the protagonist. Untrusted Javascript is let onto a server only if the server or its server-side application code is insecure.

Comment Link roulette (Score 1) 80

TFA is the first link.

I swear, you used to be able to open a Slashdot submission and know which was the actual link to the TFA.

What's with this current trend of camoflaguing links in your text so nobody knows which link is the important one? In this case the TFA link has the text "USB-based human interface devices" which doesn't really indicate you'll find this "awesome button" article behind it. The second one which says "Arduino" is a link to a random Slashdot submission about the Arduino. And the third link, "Teensy USB Development Board" is a link to some supplier of that board.

Comment Re:lol wut (Score 1) 353

Holy crap you are right!

Ok I'll have to remember: double right-clicks on links on Slashdot from now on ...

Thanks frustrated clicking!

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...