Definitely whoosh.

As of this post, yes it is.

Why can't I expect free online play forever? I have it with many other older games.

Dignitas and so forth are fairly thorough in making sure it's not a spur of the moment decision, but a carefully thought out and planned one knowing all that's involved. That handles most of your point 2 already.

It doesn't need to destroy a plane to have detrimental effects.

We *know* that electronic devices can, in a practical sense, interfere with each other. This is simple physics.

The tolerances and levels involved are what is at question. The decision is made on the side of safety.

Also, all that shielding adds up to a lot of extra weight. You don't add unnecessary extra weight to a commercial aircraft - that costs a lot of money.

Not at all.

My point was that, even starting with full batteries (which it would be stupid not to), as soon as it's in the air it will have drained them plenty. Hence the flying around recharging for the night.

I suspect taking off will significantly drain the batteries in the first place.

I suspect he knew that, from the description of the sixth axe.

EA is not one of the companies that applies to the parent thread.

Note that the ash is also acidic. When you get to clearing it off, bear that in mind.

Attempting to brush it off will be fairly damaging. Washing it off with water could be a problem too. Best bet is probably very large quantities of water to dilute anything faster than it can cause damage.

(This is a problem all the airlines will also be considering.)

Look up BA Flight 9 - and you'll get an idea of what's possible here.

I would suspect that the contents of the subject field depends on what you've entered there before, as per your browser's record of such things for filling in forms automagically..

Just a tiny bit of devil's advocacy: two 15-year-olds recording themselves is still, legally, child porn. Who's harmed?