Just to throw it out there for you: my retired grandparents did. Just as mine are doing so for my sibling's spawns.

It isn't unusual in some cultures for an extended family to care for children, thus allowing both parents to work.

May or may not result in kids with more emotional ties to the grandparents but, what can you do.

Well if there is no victim, then there isn't a problem is there? If everyone is a happy consenting adult...

You're right. It's sexist. It implies men can only be drawn in by sexual attraction. It implies men cannot be hired at the booths because the jobs are preferentially given to women. It implies women hold a power over men just by existing that reduces men to simmering hormonal idiots that then cannot make a rational decision because their libido trumps their common sense.

Oh wait, you were going for the women being the victim here. My mistake. Misuse of 'literal' should have been the flag.

Because a highly attractive suave man working a both scares off male customers, making them feel inferior, intimidated and oppressed, afraid to ask questions or draw a..

When that water falls from its vertical movement, how much horizontal movement is there compared to the initial wave? i.e. is it still going to devastate inland nearly as far?

*ahem*

researched whales into extinction.

You're assuming we used the same fake names multiple times. I know I've bought maybe a dozen things over the years from there, and never gave the same name twice.

It's kinda like an online petition that way

We tried to ban being cold, but when that failed, we regulated it instead.

Wedge.

Wedge: "I'm hit! I can't stay with you."
Luke: "Get clear, Wedge. You can't do any more good back there!"
Wedge: "Sorry!"

You act like it's impossible to hate your own ethnicity. Racist is racist, regardless of punching up, down, left, right, or yourself in the crotch.

Anyway, contrary to the Republic of Mah Feelz, butthurt isn't legal grounds (for any value of 'Not Sweden'), so unless it's an actual death threat, this is pointless pandering.

Well, no, Airstrip One has fun views of terrorism, so people tweeting about a party being a blast might get swept up too.

So we should have more aggressively defended our Trademark?

Excepting the ability to make a webpage saying something, and then have another person ('web journalist') quote it, and suddenly your original research, without any proof or review, is now credible fact. Do it a few more times and it's irrefutable and you don't even need words like 'alleged' anymore. A reinforcing circle jerk of obfuscation.

Wikipedia makes a lot of claims to policy. The enforcement of said remains subjective.

Won't using HOSTS keep me safe from that?

So we should mark you down as approving the new beta?