Comment Re:This is why (Score 2) 231
Don't try to say that the system is the way it is because they can't afford to change it. The system is the way it is because they're making TONS of money this way and have no financial reason to change it.
Don't try to say that the system is the way it is because they can't afford to change it. The system is the way it is because they're making TONS of money this way and have no financial reason to change it.
I think the increase in amateur radio licenses probably has more to do with more people expecting the S to HTF. There seems to be a growing expectation that a global collapse, nuclear holocaust, government collapse, zombie apocalypse are just around the corner. It's probably a combination between that and people wanting to be prepared for more local or regional disasters like blizzards, hurricanes, tornadoes, etc.
But seriously folks, the auto manufacturers would fight tooth and nail to NOT use standardized parts so they can have a huge markup on THEIR brand of part.
For the record I don't claim to have invented it, a lot of people naturally came up with it around the same time.
That never stopped the USPTO
Hail to the king baby!
no, because the subject of the article lost his license to play the game when he used a external hack program
OK, this is a scary thing. This would effectively allow software vendors to attach copyright infringement penalties to EULA violations. Nevermind if you bought it legally. If you do something that violates the EULA, you have infringed their copyright.
You get to burn in hell with actors, strippers, whores and professional athletes.
Your ideas intrigue me and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
Not quite. Judges often consider reasonableness, public interest and the relative sophistication of both parties. When one party is a company with a legal team and the other party is Joe Consumer judges often lean towards protecting the little guy when the deal is an un-negotiated take-it-or-leave it one.
Except in this case. This ruling by judges is in direct opposition to protecting the little guy. They have ruled that an EULA is enforceable on someone that never even agreed to the EULA.
removing your noses despite your faces?
I believe you mean "removing your nose TO SPITE your face..."
As opposed to the plethora of other issues with that post?
I had premarital sex in Saudi Arabia. Then I ran back to Israel.
Your ideas intrigue me and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
If you think the system is working, ask someone who's waiting for a prompt.