Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:This is very bad design (Score 1) 215

I think you're still missing the point. The point is that they made a statement which leaves room for interpretation. Your mindset leads you to make certain inferences that you feel are common sense. There's nothing wrong with your interpretation of the statement; what's wrong is that they made the statement in such a way as to require you to reach your conclusions.

A better statement could have been, "a technician mistakenly entered commands that resulted in the system failure," if that is what happened. Then there's no room for you or me to reach any conclusions, because they told us what really happened.

Comment Re:This is very bad design (Score 1) 215

I believe OP's point is the way VMWare described the occurrence. By dumbing-down the official explanation, they imply several statements I would not want to hear from a professional service provider:
  • - Our users are too stupid to understand the real cause
  • - We're too stupid to understand the real cause
  • - Our employees can't be trusted to truthfully recount the events of an incident to their management
  • - Our systems are so fragile that an actual errant touch brings down the whole operation
  • - We've discovered an issue so severe that we're afraid to tell our users / the world what it is, lest it be exploited

That's the problem with vague, imprecise explanations. They leave room for interpretation.

Slashdot Top Deals

Real Programmers don't eat quiche. They eat Twinkies and Szechwan food.

Working...