Yeah, normally I'd've run it by one of my Portuguese or Brazilian colleagues, but strike while the iron is hot and all that.

OTOH... A Facebook without my 37-years-old cousin's incessant stream of junior-high-grade nigger and peepee jokes might be a Facebook I wasn't embarrassed to belong to.

Nonononono... Once again you've failed to localise properly. Try this:

Vocês todos são vacas. Vacas dizer mú. MÚÚÚÚÚÚÚÚÚ! MÚÚÚÚÚÚÚÚÚÚ! Múúúúú vacas MÚÚÚÚÚ! Múúúú dizer as vacas. VOCÊ VACAS!!

This instalment of I18n For Today's Active Troll presented as a public service of the Slashdot Network and this station.

No fucking inverted interrogation or exclamation points.

Further proof that Slashdot is indeed mired in 1997 or thereabouts.

If you work in my org, the first day of the week is Thursday.

Sorry, for this article, it needs to be "Todos de Uds. son vacas. Vacas dicen mú. MÚÚÚÚÚ! MÚÚÚÚÚ! Mú dicen las vacas. UDS. SON VACAS!!"

In a region with a history of actual political assassinations and disappearances, I'd be quite concerned about a possible followup visit. But I guess that's just me.

Do you often ask rhetorical questions? :D

(Sorry, couldn't resist.)

Thanks for sharing. Don't spend the 50 centavos all in one place.

Thank you for the kind words, Sir|Ma'am|Flipper.

She had a choice between (a) defending the client assigned to her and (b) incurring the wrath of the court for failing to obey its lawful order. (b) could have meant gaol time and/or disbarment.

You'd imply that Clinton's defence of her client caused the rape to occur? That's pretty silly.

I've decided to blow off the downmod I just gave you in order to explain something to you:

1. Clinton was appointed by the court to defend an accused rapist.

2. She asked to be excused from the case, presumably because she knew or at least strongly suspected the defendant had actually committed the offence.

3. The judge would not let her off the case.

ExecSummary: Hillary Clinton was *ordered* by the State to act to the best of her ability in the interest of the defendant. And this is exactly what she appears to have done. You may or may not like her or her politics, but in this case *she did the job which she was legally and ethically bound to perform*. If you cannot understand why she did so, then you've never any business ever voting in a US election or especially ever serving on a jury in a US criminal trial.

"The good news is, the school bully can steal your lunch money only once today."

Oh, well, that makes it perfectly okay, then. *eyeroll*

I don't live in a basement. But I am concerned about being held liable for what others do with my connection.