Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Plenty of differences (Score 1) 1307

That, combined with a generally quite low tax burden (compared to most first world nations the US has very low taxes), means that raising taxes in the US is a very valid strategy.

Theoretically possible I suppose, but politically completely impossible. Even talk about allowing "temporary" tax cuts expire was politically impossible. The entire debate wasn't on letting them expire, but on who would get them permanently. Actually raising taxes in the US isn't a subject that can even be broached.

Comment Re: Internet without evangelicals = Win (Score 1) 293

You are arguing that there is no need for some laws because no-one discriminates on those grounds. That's a bad way to make laws. They should be as broad as possible so that they don't have to figure out every single possible situation. Laws should set out the principals that should apply in all cases.

The principal is that discrimination of things that a person cannot control, such as their sexuality, is not allowed. Rather than coming up with a list of exceptions of inclusions to that rule, it should just be a general rule. Aside from simplifying the situation, it's also the best possible option for society in general, since society generally does not tolerate discrimination of that kind even if there are religious reasons for it. Religion is a choice, it offers no protection.

Comment Re: Internet without evangelicals = Win (Score 1) 293

They're equally as egregious. If you have a license to do business with the public, you serve all the public. The only limits are those customers who are causing a disturbance to other customers. You can't single out swathes of the population because you don't understand the difference between making a cake for something and condoning that thing. "Participating in a gay wedding ceremony" by being miles away from it and unaware it is going on, save for a cake you cooked and were paid handsomely for? Give me a fucking break. Just because you can crowbar in some weasel words doesn't mean the two things are in any way different.

Comment Re:Links to the actual study? (Score 1) 300

Sorry, I looked for a non-paywalled copy but couldn't find one. I thought the story would be a good opportunity to mean about stuff we like that was cancelled/discontinued, and how if online advertisers could identify these people they could spam them with adverts for competitor's products.

I'm trying to keep Slashdot alive here with a light story and a chance for some good old geek nostalgia/venting.

Comment Re:Internet without evangelicals = Win (Score 2) 293

My expectation is that it will be quickly overrun by trolls. Some of them non-Christians, but many of them Christian trolls pushing an extreme view and harassing others with it. The Bible is so contradictory that you can find a way to interpret some bit of it to support pretty much any point of view, and then batter your opponent over the head with it and scream about them burning forever in the fires of hell etc. The best part is that your opponent is full of self doubt and loathing so won't just dismiss you as a troll in most cases.

For evidence, see current Christian groups on Facebook.

Comment Re:Citizen of Belgium here (Score 1) 1307

You're equivocating about the term "racism", using the term on the one hand to refer to the existence of small extremist groups

When you say, "small extremist groups" are you referring to the police, state governments and the Republican party?

Comment Re: Internet without evangelicals = Win (Score 2) 293

Making decisions like that on a case-by-case basis is impractical. More over, even if it is only a minor issue for the person buying the cake at that particular moment, it becomes a bigger issue if they find that they can't have their wedding in their home town because no-one will rent them a suit/dress, the local hotels won't rent twin beds to same sex couples, the local caterers won't cater their reception party etc.

That's why anti-discrimination laws are universal. Individual incidents might not be so bad for those affected, but they add up.

Submission + - Apple Music uses discriminatory pricing to compete world-wide

AmiMoJo writes: Apple tends to not care much about price competitiveness. Without telco subsidies, which typically occur only in rich countries, consumers looking to buy an iPhone 6 in Asia will have to shell out $600. But the company is taking a different approach with Apple Music, its new music streaming service. Over a hundred countries will get access to the service today, but whereas prices for iPhones tend to stay high even in poor countries, in the case of Apple Music they’re lower—indicating the company is serious about courting emerging markets with digital media. In the US, Apple is charging monthly fees of $10 for an individual Apple Music account, and $15 for a family account that can be shared with up to six people. In India, for example, the monthly fee is $2 for individual and $3 for family plans. In Brazil, Indonesia, and Thailand, it’s $5 and $7; in Hong Kong, $6 and $10; and in Singapore, $7.50 and $11 (in US dollars).

Comment Re:"Harbinger of Failure" = Hipsters? (Score 0) 300

I thought that the meme was that Hipsters buy Apple products. Yet they are usually outstanding successes.

If you're looking for harbingers of failure in the tech world, I imagine it's probably neckbeards who call you people "hipsters" and keep on believing that this will be the year of Linux on the desktop.

Comment Re:"Harbinger of Failure" = Hipsters? (Score 3, Insightful) 300

Is this just another term for hipsters? People who seek out things that everyone else has dismissed for (usually) good reasons.

No. Because the "good reason" usually is "most people aren't doing that anymore." The article is about things that *never* become cool, not things that were cool in grandpa's day.

The real problem with being a hipster is that the ideal of non-conformity is inconsistent with the idea of fashion.

Comment Re: Good for greece (Score 1) 1307

Slovenia was not the center of a province called "Rome" for hundreds of years. Northern Mexico was not part of a province called "America" for hundreds of years. The appropriate analogy would be if the US later collapsed, and the southewestern border states were overrun by Mexicans (and then later other peoples), and then much later said people insisted on being called Americans, even though they had interbred with their conquerors.

Note that the people in Greek Macedonia are no more "direct descendants" of the ancient Macedonians than the people of modern Macedonia. Probably less, due to the huge refugee influx that was settled there.

Slashdot Top Deals

Never test for an error condition you don't know how to handle. -- Steinbach

Working...