Comment Re:Alternate use for this technology (Score 1) 188
In a city? A
In a city? A
For one, you don't edit the news. You relay the facts as is.
They did. The relayed fact was both correct and relevant. All this noise is about choosing one fact over the other when both could not be picked.
"All things come to those who wait"
Yes, but we want asteroids, not meteorites. Or worse, an impactor that doesn't just break up and lie there.
How about instead of trying to spin it one way or the other, try publishing the facts.
The facts of what? "Intoxicated man takes a taxi, family of four gets home safe and sound"?
The whole reason we used to get paid extra to provide support was to provide support. That meant weird hours, weekends, and late nights.
If you don't like it, get another job.
Worse than that. It's like Brave New World news. The only things fit to publish are the things that keep us happy(and thus amendable to advertisements in this case). It's not trying to make on specific entity look good, it's trying to engage in actual mind control via selection bias.
Ironically, this might actually end up giving a more accurate picture of the world, because disasters and scandals tend to be big and flashy, while good news come as constant stream of small things. Overall, the stream drowns out the flames - our civilization would had never gotten off the ground otherwise - but it's the odd flame that becomes ever so more newsworthy by its very rareness.
Politics of fear are based on and enabled by this very phenomenom, and we've all seen them cause completely irrational - and often very destructive - decisions. So feel-good popular newsfeed could very well end up undermining demagogues by acting as counterpoison to fearmongering.
Why didn't I think of that.... penal colony for illegal immigrants involving long term imprisonment and hard labor.
Does a private prison company gaining sentience and posting on Slashdot count as AI, some kind of group mind or just a regular evil overlord?
Daikatana was about as Japanese as the Teenage Mutant Turtles.
Nature -- specifically evolution -- disagrees.
Evolution doesn't deal with life or death, it deals with the relative abundance of properties in populations. If anything, our innovation - cultural evolution - is such success precisely because it removes death from the equation. Now the main thrust is on the evolution of our various superorganisms - cultures - rather than our bodies, thus allowing adaptation at blitzkrieg speeds compared to even bacteria, much less any other complex organisms.
In other words, even though the statement about cars kill a lot of people is true, the statement does NOT make the cyclist are menace to be false.
"Menace" is a subjective value judgement. "Cars kill a lot of people" does affect "cyclists are a menace" because both are statements about the dangers of various forms of locomotion. Locomotion itself is unavoidable, so the question becomes which form is safest, and "menace" implies cycling is far from it.
All majorities are potential wolves, unless restrained by government limits that are respected. They respect the limits because they know they aren't the only majority.
So why would they be "potential wolves" in the first place, if they understand this?
This time only the bad guy died, but even him did not deserve capital punishment for a car jack
...
Nature -- specifically evolution -- disagrees. You don't get a vote.
So Tesla's anti-theft system is 100% lethal?
No, but evolution's anti-massive-stupidity system is pretty lethal. Less so nowadays, but... still.
"Hey, think I'll drive triple digits in a randomly active urban environment in a vehicle I'm not familiar with, while (justifiably) paranoid!"
The NSA just puts this all up in "the cloud" where storage is unlimited and safe.
They're scared of Aereo because it will just increase the number of people cutting the cord with traditional media vendors. They want to keep the $80/month entertainment tax rather than let people have a $20/month alternative.
Normally you would expect broadcaster to not mind where their royalties come from, except that most of the broadcasters are owned by the cable companies.
Saliva causes cancer, but only if swallowed in small amounts over a long period of time. -- George Carlin