Comment Re:short answer: you don't, go for slow, silent fa (Score 1) 229
just sayin'
You say that as if there was something wrong with a bias against stupid people.
yep, this is flamebait, rightly modded. who's idea was it to post a story with 'flamewar' in the summary to anything other than Idle? *sigh*
So would dumping him in the ocean somewhere in the first 5 minutes
He's an aquatic creature. There would be little point.
To be effective, he needs to be sucked out an airlock...
Yep. Yep he does.
http://video.adultswim.com/robot-chicken/jar-jar-returns.html
I'd like to see an analysis of the instances quoted.
Ab-so-lutely. And frankly, I'll be more inclined to dive into said analysis when I can go to RTFA for its info, and not find it taking the form of a complaint--a whiny complaint containing heavy injections of prejudice in its own right, a la srlinuxx: "I accepted that's just the way men are. They've always been that way and they always would."
That doesn't get around the bottleneck at all.
I get nearly 2X the speed of a single drive that is limited by SATA. Theoretically, that might not be the same thing but for all *PRACTICAL* purposes, it gets around the bottleneck just fine for me
:-)
Yep, doubling your bus count usually doubles your transfer speed. *rolling eyes*
...get the old glass...
...he stole the glass...
Reading comprehension people. Just garbage-picking construction debris for fun and profit. If you're going to "roadside-recycle," industrial waste is where it's at.
"When the going gets tough, the tough get empirical." -- Jon Carroll