Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:symbols, caps, numbers (Score 1) 549

Actually, if you think about it, standardizing on those kinds of requirements is kind of dumb, since it limits the combinations of different passwords people can use.

Agreed. Using a good password quality algorithm, and requiring a minimum level of strength, would be a much better tool than restricting input.

Comment Re:And? (Score 5, Funny) 367

I worked at a Chick-fil-A about 15 years ago. A man walked up to me and asked for the corporate office number.

Me:

Sure thing, can I ask what this is in regards to?

Him, holding up a table-top display:

I am a member of PETA. I do not like what you are doing to these cows, making them stand up and hold signs while wearing costumes.

I'm pretty sure I started laughing, until I noticed the guy was completely straight-faced.

Comment Re:Start menu usage dropped in lieu of what? (Score 1) 269

It seemed more like the following, to me:

Let's create a version of Windows that is aimed aggressively at tablets. None of this Windows 7 Tablet PC edition, rather something that really embraces new hardware and technology. Full pane applications and home screen, with application lifecycle management and an app store, just like other tablet operating systems.

Oh and for added value, let's allow Windows desktop apps to run on it. Users can plug in mice and keyboards and it becomes like a small desktop.

Microsoft had already designed the Start screen, but it turns out telemetry data suggests the Start menu isn't of huge importance. And Fitts's Law suggests the Start screen might actually be better in some ways.

Of course, all that is true, and is great for a tablet-first OS. But then they branded it Windows 8 (not Windows Tablet or something like that) and marketed it as the successor to Windows 7. So, in my mind, it's a marketing screw-up and Windows 9 was always in the backs of their minds as the true successor to 7.

Comment Re: Fine! (Score 1) 365

I haven't tried, so really I don't know, but I suspect that at least 75% of the total border length (that is not on an ocean or country border) could be drawn using latitude and longitude lines, with the rest using straight angled lines.

I don't see any great reason to attempt to make land area or population equal. Our political system accounts for inequality in these areas (although it could do better, and I'm certain we could get rid of the electoral college before we could redraw the states).

But the population center argument makes a lot of sense for reasons you specified. However, this philosophy may require adjustments in the future as population centers change over time.

In any case... it seems the only way this will happen is if the US collapses, and from what most post-apocalyptic TV shows indicates, the way to do that is to permanently kill our ability to create and use electricity.

Comment Re: Fine! (Score 1) 365

Well, ok, and I'd gladly do anything to get Auburn out of the state. :)

Actually the Florida panhandle, in my opinion, makes so much more sense as part of Alabama. The residents, their political leaning, and the general culture are closer to southern Alabama than to the rest of Florida.

But I don't really understand why the boundaries are curved. Natural features still make more sense in my opinion, but ignoring that, why not focus more on lines of longitude and latitude? Perhaps some straight diagonals.

But I agree that the northeast does make more sense (border shapes excluded) than the current arrangement.

I'd like to see this map, but with 8 or 16 states (hey let's make it a power of 2 while we're at it) and straight borders.

Slashdot Top Deals

You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred. -- Superchicken

Working...