They didn't rewrite the kernel from scratch so that puts it into 6.4 - 6.99999 range.
Just a minor nitpick... Software version numbers are not decimal numbers but separate units (major.minor).
After 6.9 comes 6.10. After 6.99999 comes 6.100000.
Doesn't seem much different when anyone brings up X11 vs Wayland, etc. It all boils down to 'I DON'T LIKE CHANGE!!11'
It's funny. Is there a single Linux component that people are eagerly waiting for in Slashdot?
Like "can't wait for this, it's going to make the Linux ecosystem so much nicer"?
I expect the next round of silly whining to start when distros begin to adopt KDE5. Will stock some popcorn for that one.
but by now I assume most of the YouTube content plays through HTML 5 if one want to?
True. All clips can be watched in HTML5 now in YouTube, including live broadcasts.
I think there's still many local TV broadcast services which require Flash. For example in Finland I still need Flash to use YLE Areena, the public TV/radio broadcaster's online clip hive.
As long as the 64-bit version fully supports Flash on all platforms, I'm all for it. Like it or not, you need to support Flash, 64-bit or not.
Umm...Chrome comes always with the integrated PPAPI Flash plugin. Actually it's the only way to use a modern Flash plugin under Linux. As far as I know, the crusty NPAPI Flash plugin on Linux (package flashplugin-installer in Ubuntu, for example) still gets security updates, but is otherwise stuck on some ancient version number.
"And remember: Evil will always prevail, because Good is dumb." -- Spaceballs