Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Just wrong (Score 1) 433

To video record in Illinois you do not need to inform anybody, only audio requires consent.

Illinois's wiretapping law is a "two-party consent" law. Illinois makes it a crime to use an "eavesdropping device" to overhear or record a phone call or conversation without the consent of all parties to the conversation. The law defines an "eavesdropping device" as "any device capable of being used to hear or record oral conversation or intercept, retain, or transcribe electronic communication whether such conversation or electronic communication is conducted in person, by telephone, or by any other means." 720 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/14-1, -2. If you are operating in Illinois, you should always get the consent of all parties before recording an in-person conversation or telephone call. In addition to subjecting you to criminal prosecution, violating the Illinois wiretapping statute can expose you to a civil lawsuit for damages by an injured party. While you generally are permitted to photograph or record video of people without permission in most public places, it is illegal in Illinois to "videotape, photograph, or film" people without their consent in "a restroom, tanning bed, or tanning salon, locker room, changing room or hotel bedroom." 720 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/26-4(a) (scroll down).

http://www.citmedialaw.org/legal-guide/illinois-recording-law

Music

Astronaut Sues Dido For Album Cover 264

An anonymous reader writes "Astronaut Bruce McCandless is suing Dido for her album cover that uses a famous NASA photograph of a tiny, tiny, tiny McCandless floating in space. McCandless doesn't own the copyright on the photo, so he's claiming it's a violation of his publicity rights ... except that he's so tiny in the photo, it's not like anyone's going to recognize him."
Earth

Nuclear Power Could See a Revival 415

shmG writes "As the US moves to reduce dependence on oil, the nuclear industry is looking to expand, with new designs making their way through the regulatory process. No less than three new configurations for nuclear power are being considered for licensing by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The first of them could be generating power in Georgia by 2016."

Comment Re:These LRADs are pathetic (Score 1) 630

"rapidly" is not exactly a precise amount. What if they mean 10 dB every 10 meters? Also, this device is made for crowd control. Sooner or later it will get used at close range, either by accident or because some idiot tought it was a good idea.

you chopped off the important part again.

the rest of the statement gave details, "The sound level will drop off rapidly according to the inverse square law as you get farther away"

A simple google search will show you that the inverse square law says

Acoustics The inverse-square law is used in acoustics in measuring the sound intensity at a given distance from the source. Example In acoustics, the sound pressure of a spherical wavefront radiating from a point source decreases by 50% as the distance r is doubled, or measured in dB it decreases by 6.02 dB.

meaning that every time the distance is doubled the power is halved.

so precise amount was given, you just ignored it or did not know what it was.

Comment Re:These LRADs are pathetic (Score 0, Flamebait) 630

only 150 dB? that's plenty to cause irreversable damage.

That was a good attempt at spinning mrcaseyj's statement, but you fell short.

You know what he was saying is that the only place the device reaches the level of 150 dB is in a one meter range.

Not that 150 dB is a low amount.

The evidence is in the next statement of "The sound level will drop off rapidly according to the inverse square law as you get farther away"

But I have a suspicion that you are the type to not care about what the truth is, only how it can be twisted to fit whatever cause of the moment you are fighting for.

Comment Re:YRO??!! (Score 1) 447

Well, the US side of the border now wants to search "laptops, digital cameras, cell phones and any other electronics on your person or in your vehicle", as described in the article.

What we want on our side of the border is for our authorities to enforce our own gun laws and stop and search people coming from the US into Mexico.

So what you are saying is.... It will not stop the gun runners, you were just being (A. sensationalist; B. off topic; C. dumb). pick one.

Comment Re:YRO??!! (Score 1) 447

The real difference is going to be when you cross the border driving. There's been waaay too many documented cases of people buying guns (and I mean big guns, like assault rifles) legally in the US with their God-given 2nd ammendment right and smuggling them to the drug cartels here.

Searching "laptops, digital cameras, cell phones and any other electronics on your person or in your vehicle" will stop the gun runners how?.....

Comment Re:Well that sounds reasonable (Score 1) 273

it's because they've got a large number of armed goons at their disposal and you have nothing.

This made me think of V (from V for vendetta) passing the DHS check point...

DHS: "Bollocks. What you gonna do, huh? We've swept this place. You've got nothing. Nothing but your bloody knives and your fancy karate gimmicks. We have guns."
V: "No, what you have are bullets and the hope that when your guns are empty, I'm no longer standing, because if I am, you'll all be dead before you've reloaded."

Now that i would like to see

Slashdot Top Deals

FORTRAN is not a flower but a weed -- it is hardy, occasionally blooms, and grows in every computer. -- A.J. Perlis

Working...