Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:great... (Score 1) 208

In the mean time they have made it substantially more difficult to configure the rejection of cookies.

Jesus... I'm actually thinking IE is better at this point.

Pay no attention to Firefox's built-in cookie-handling interface; it's designed for Joe Kegger — not computer nerds and/or privacy control-freaks. Get whatever cookie-handling plugin(s) that'll give you the level of control you need.

I use CookieSafe v3.0.5*, which I have set to block by default, and then "allow" and "allow for session" sites I want to white-list. Also provided: "allow temporarily" (for current session, then block), which is handy for determining if a site requires cookies to function, and "remove" (to get rid of domains' cookies that I used to allow).

Another cookie plugin I like is Self-Destructing Cookies, which provides "delete-on-tab-close;" "delete-on-browser-close;" and "never delete." Unlike CookieSafe, however, it lacks a function for viewing the complete rule-set — only the rule in use for the currently-selected tab's domain.

* If I remember correctly, there's a different version or branch of CookieSafe that's incompatible with recent versions of Firefox, plus a "Lite" version that's little better than Firefox's built-in level of control.

Comment Re:I want my internet back (Score 2) 129

Another confirmation that our idea of the internet has devolved in the hands of entrepeneurs.

I'm with you. Some people seem to have had it drilled into their heads that they've got some moral duty to download and expose themselves to corporate propaganda ((i.e., advertizements) and the malware* that frequently accompanies it), lest the Internet shrivel up and die. They forget that aside from spam, the Internet started out nearly ad-free, and that ads were scarce for a while in the beginning of the 1990s web-boom.

I don't think it'd necessarily be a bad thing if ad-dependent content disappeared; what would remain would be material that's important enough that someone's willing to ask for donations, pay out of their own pocket — or both — in order to make it freely available. Wikipedia (for instance) seems to work fine using this model, and is better for it, I think, than if it kowtowed to corporate-huckster "benefactors."

* I consider the ads themselves a form of malware — mental malware meant to manipulate peoples' purchase decisions (as manipulation is the intent behind propaganda of any type).

Comment Re:Crime? (Score 1) 397

..and for whatever reason, Slashdot refuses to show the first link. Just forget it.

Well, your sig told me to "trust the Computer," and that "the Computer is [my] friend." Sorry to say, but it appears that the Computer isn't even your friend, despite your going out on a limb to vouch for it. After seeing how it treated you, I'm thinking "fuck the Computer; the Computer is a jerk."

Comment Re:oh for (Score 1) 75

well, that blows. As a content creator with two documentaries on the piratebay, that pisses me off.

Post the torrent hashes someplace where people can find them, and they'll remain accessible for as long as online stewardship of the torrents' data are maintained. For greater user convenience, magnet links can be created using the torrent hashes (on properly-constructed/maintained, standards-compliant web sites (e.g., not Slashdot)).

Comment In Related News... (Score 2) 75

PARIS — In a bizarre victory for the French imaginary property industry, a French court has ruled that the deck chairs on the RMS Titanic are to be rearranged, effective immediately. In an effort to comply with the court's order, French and US authorities are negotiating the extradition of director/enthusiast James Cameron and his personal submarine — capable of both reaching the Titanic and rearranging her deckchairs via robotic claw — to the icy North Atlantic, where the ill-fated symbol of man's hubris sunk nearly one US-copyright-term-length ago.

Comment Re:Overrated (Score 5, Insightful) 218

As a foreigner, I'd never heard of Salinger or Catcher in the Rye. When I first made it to the US, my friend gave me the book: "You HAVE to read that". I was underwhelmed and to this day still do not understand what all the fuss is about. A story about a whiney teenager with too much money for his own good ? This describe America pretty well to me !!!

No way, god damn it. I think "The Catcher in the goddamn Rye" is one of the best goddamn books there is. Hell, I think it even won a few o' them fancy goddamn awards, but I can't remember their goddamn names.

Comment Links (Score 5, Informative) 218

https://kickass.to/three-stories-j-d-salinger-pdf-t8257205.html

https://torcache.net/torrent/ED8F9DE4B9151B3B0E5B998CAF7A124E9E7B0E17.torrent?title=%5Bkickass.to%5Dthree.stories.j.d.salinger.pdf

magnet:?xt=urn:btih:ED8F9DE4B9151B3B0E5B998CAF7A124E9E7B0E17&dn=three+stories+j+d+salinger+pdf&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.istole.it%3A80%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337

Slashdot fucks up magnet links, but the hash is right there: ED8F9DE4B9151B3B0E5B998CAF7A124E9E7B0E17

Submission + - Did Satoshi Nakamoto transfer 1,000 bitcoins to the Silk Road? (computerworld.com.au)

An anonymous reader writes: A research paper probing the Silk Road's stash of bitcoins found an odd transaction: A transfer of 1,000 bitcoins from an address created just a week after the bitcoin network launched. They conclude that it could have been an address controlled by Satoshi Nakamoto or someone close to him, although they admit it is speculation. The transfer was made in March, when 1,000 bitcoins would have been valued around $60,000. Now, the value of the transaction is more than 10 times that.

Comment Re:Food for thought (Score 1) 783

The highlight of your post was this: "I have this duty because if I agreed to a search, then I further the normalization of pathetic submission, embolden the authorities, and increase for my fellow citizen the expectation that they, too, should needlessly submit to the whims of dangerous thugs."

The more we accept it, the more brazen they get.

Thank you, and I agree with you succinct addendum.

If you (or someone you know might) want help overcoming intimidation by cops, I recommend Flex Your Rights and especially their online video series (produced in conjunction with ACLU) — their video scenarios use pretty realistic (albeit non-violent) cops that try to be belligerent, verbally coercive, and using threatening body language (at least, as realistic as you'd expect from low-budget actors). I think their videos have more practical/frequent daily utility than the "Don't Talk to Cops" video we've all seen.

Comment Re:Awww (Score 1) 400

Me too — I suspect that either the link I posted drew too much attention, or widespread deployment of wget (in order to copy the site for posterity) is provoked AOL/NS into locking down the site. (Web directory listings are nearly always 403/401 in my experience.)

That link worked for years, and I checked it mere seconds before I posted it. I wish I had copied that directory and put it up as a torrent. I guess I may have thought NS was being "cool" by allowing dir/list access there to those who found it.

I'm really sorry to anyone who didn't get there in time, and for not having created a torrent. :o(

Submission + - Geeks for Monarchy: The Rise of the Neoreactionaries (techcrunch.com)

Third Position writes: Many of us yearn for a return to one golden age or another. But there’s a community of bloggers taking the idea to an extreme: they want to turn the dial way back to the days before the French Revolution.

Neoreactionaries believe that while technology and capitalism have advanced humanity over the past couple centuries, democracy has actually done more harm than good. They propose a return to old-fashioned gender roles, social order and monarchy.

Slashdot Top Deals

Anyone can make an omelet with eggs. The trick is to make one with none.

Working...