Does Hobby Lobby choose which stocks are included in their 401k, or do they outsource to a financial institution?

Funny, that's been my stance my entire adult life. My sect is fine with contraceptives, but sees most abortions as sinful (obvious exceptions exist, such as terminating a pregnancy caused by rape). I share this view, but recognize that others may disagree. Just don't make me pay for it.

We didn't have assigned stalls in the parking lot (indeed, the stalls weren't even numbered). In non-game days it was first-come first-served. Each resident was allowed to register a single vehicle with the office. Temporary passes were available for visitors, and parking stickers were only enforced after hours or on game day.

I lived in a town home in a college town. Our landlord rented our parking lot out during football games. The landlords made big bucks, but residents had to prove they lived there in order to avoid the parking fee.

It depends on the total travel time, time zone difference, and whether going east or west. I have almost no problems traveling between Utah and Hawaii (3 or 4 hour difference), but it took the better part of a week to adjust when flying from Sao Paulo to Honolulu (more than 28 hours traveling, 8 hours time zone difference). It took three days getting used to Sao Paulo when I flew there from Utah the first time (20 hours travel; 5 hour time zone difference), but only one day the second time (3 hour time zone difference).

Please read up on Manifest Destiny before making such a claim. This idea of expansionism didn't really take off until the 19th century.

You are correct in the reason that most fonts only contain a subset of Unicode code points. There are thousands of code points. Most documents will only use a small subset. Why should I have to have all those Chinese or Arabic characters when I only write in English, Spanish, Portuguese, and Hawaiian? People who read and write Hawaiian have fonts which support the Hawaiian letters `okina and kahako. Chinese have fonts which support the Chinese glyphs.

As for language support, that isn't a font's problem. It's up to the writer to know how to intelligently combine glyphs into words, and words into coherent thoughts.

Most elements in HTML accept the lang attribute. Please refer to the W3C

That just shows the need of Turing tests in other languages. Intelligence isn't bound to a single language. I speak intelligently in English, but am only conversant in Portuguese, and would have the language skills of a 13-year-old in Spanish. I may pick up words in French or Italian, but I couldn't answer any better than a "I don't speak ___" answer. The bot claimed to be from Ukraine, so why not hold the test in Russian or Ukrainian? Make a new requirement that participants must indicate a natural language enough in advance as to find judges competent in that tongue.

Perhaps they should have Turing Tests in different languages? The human or bot must indicate a test language before hand so that judges well-versed in that language can be assembled. I probably couldn't do any better if I was given a Turing Test in French. Having a judge familiar with a particular region would also make it harder for a bot to pass (Can you imagine trying to get an emotional rise out of a Brazilian-based bot on the topic of futebol?).

Only in some circumstances. Please read up on expectation of privacy and right to privacy. When in public, you don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy (except in places such as bathrooms). You cannot control who may overhear a conversation, take your picture, or film your actions. Not even your garbage is protected, once it hits the curb.

Look at the Boy Scouts of America. They are a private organization who up until recently denied both boys and leaders who were openly gay. Opening up their organization to openly gay boys (but still denying openly gay leaders) was their own decision and not the result of a lawsuit (or threat thereof). The biggest sponsor of the Boy Scouts of America is The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Nearly every congregation of the LDS Church has a scout troop. The scout master of each of these congregation-based troops is LDS, but boys of all religious persuasions are welcome. The oath to be "morally clean" doesn't limit itself to any particular faith.

Now look to both presidential campaigns by Mitt Romney. Mitt Romney's family joined the LDS Church in the 1830s. His adversaries constantly called into question his Mormon faith. Huckabee even said that no true Christian could ever vote for a Mormon President. If people judge a candidate based on religion, why not judge corporations?

The main point I wanted to make is that individuals, and not the state, should be free to judge by whatever standard they want. Support organizations with values with which you agree while withholding support from those with which you disagree.

If I owned a country club, I wouldn't let Tiger become a member because of his moral misconduct and the possible damage being associated with him could cause.

Actually, as a private organization, it would be up to them to decide whether to disallow openly gay players and / or owners. Perspective owners and players would need to know of such a rule (and fans would want to know about it, too). Those who don't agree with such a stance would be free to not participate in nor support such an organization. No one's legal rights would be trampled.

As per homosexual players, I think their teammates should have the strongest word, considering that most locker rooms don't have private showers. Personally, I choose which teams to support based on performance on the field and moral conduct of its owners and players. I don't take into account sexual orientation, but will note if the owner cheats on a spouse.

Except only those making less than $15/hr will see that increase. As someone who earns more than minimum wage it won't benefit me, and in fact will take away much of my buying power.