This is simply not newsworthy.
That's why you won't ever read about this in the New York Times. At least that's the excuse they've using for years to cover up anything that makes them look bad or doesn't push their agenda.
Another search engine will come along and then that'll be the flavor of the month for a while, and it's no skin off my back either way.
Looks like a lot of people agree with you.
Only question - does the Kin come in "Feces Brown"?
Why, yes it does. All you have to do is scrape the outer coat of paint off that turd of a phone.
...denialists' conspiracy theories
No bias there?
Other than the tweaking of some peoples' overly-developed sense of aesthetics, and a few access roads and power lines, I don't see much damage being done.
That's easy to say when hundreds of square miles of other peoples land is being destroyed to please some peoples sense of "green" correctness. And what's this crap about a "few access roads and power lines"? Just for this one project, they are going to need HUNDREDS of roads and HUNDREDS of power conditioning sub-stations, and HUNDREDS of miles of transmission lines.
...and it has the added benefit of guaranteeing that no additional development will occur on the land, indefinitely...
That's because it will have already been developed! Hundreds of square miles to generate less power at lower reliability (the wind doesn't always blow) and much higher cost than a natural gas plant could produce on 160 acres (that's a quarter square mile for the "green experts" out there who may not know). You advocate destroying hundreds of square miles to placate a "green" sensibility, and yet still have the gall to accuse other people of having an "overly developed" sense of aesthetics!
What hypocrisy.
It is easier to write an incorrect program than understand a correct one.