Comment Re:Fallout... (Score 1) 381
Hogwash.
News organizations have a right to publish information. The government cannot chill free speech by declaring some things 'publishable' and other 'non-publishable.' The Supreme Court dealt with this in the Pentagon Papers case.
And how much legal trouble is Wikileaks in? No one with Wikileaks has been charged with a crime related to the disclosure of top secret information. Julian Assange's only charge is under some Swedish law for sexual misconduct of some kind. It has no legal relation to the Wikileaks disclosures. (Now, political relations are quite different than legal. Those charges may be a legal tool to reach a political end, but that's different than they being a legal tool based on the disclosures themselves.)
Compare with Bradley Manning. He is charged with espionage because he violated his oaths as a soldier and someone who deals with confidential, top-secret information. He cannot, legally, disclose this information. This is because of his relationship with the U.S. government — a relationship most U.S. citizens do not have. (I certainly don't have top secret clearance of any kind; I also don't have a duty to not disclose top secret information.)
Finally, how much trouble have these leaks really caused? Has anyone really learned anything they didn't know?
The saddest thing is the reaction from the U.S., the world champion of free speech, to someone's exercise of free speech.