So what you are saying is we dont have ways to take out spy and comm sats. Just the dirty chinese do. Uh huh.

I have no cap on my plan. I have used 60GB in a month using my phone attached to my tv.

Do you not grasp per capita?

China produces less CO2 per person the most of the rest of the industrial world. Why do you guys go bash on Luxembourg who is 9th on the list. Tax those CO2 producing jerks. China is in the 50's on the per capita list. What do you expect them to reduce? Now Sulfur Dioxide is a whole other ball of acidy wax.

I'm pretty sure thats not how the Nazis came to power. Pretty sure it was massive debt and and super inflation.

and where did you get these per capita numbers? The US isn't even in the top 10. Why don't you go rail on Luxembourg who is 9 on the list of per capital CO2 emissions. China is like way down in the 50's and the US is 12th. Australia is above the US as is the falkland islands. Its pretty stupid to talk about total emissions and compare 300,000,000 people with say the UK at 75,000,000. In fact Canada is only about 2% behind the US in per capita emissions.

There is a whole wiki page full of them.

Yeah see I would never now any of that. I just see mit and like most people who have lives I cant do a background check on everyone. But everyone is taking money from someone with an agenda. Musk discounts fuel cell on mas. Japan disagrees and is going full bore on fuel cell. So do I believe the guy who has a public company who is profit driven or the other car company that is profit driven? Do I believe the paper by the researcher looking for funding and tenure or the crazy guy who can say what he wants because he has tenure and doent need to have the same opinion as the institution. There have been studies on the heard mentalli8 that exist in institutional reseach as non tenure researchers tend to not want to rock the boat. Doesnt make them wrong but there is yen and yang on the who is reliable and who is not.

Wtf are you talking about. I said there are scientist that dont agree with ipcc. Im not a scientist so I dont know why they believe what they believe. It has zero to do with what I believe.

There are scientists of note that do not agree with the consensus. I dont know what they believe or why but when their studies are exclude I see all the other times the consensus was wrong. Im not in the club I dont know what their opposing science is but it's not just religious people that have a view contrary to the group. Is this Richard Lendzen MIT dude not at all respectable?

Can we just use the old furnaces in poland? Geez do you even think about what you are saying?

Yeah deniers. Round em up and put them all in one place where the are concentrated. The can have their own camps and stop ruining our society. Yeah thats worked in the past. SIGH

Mode up more. I love how they says we don't know why. REALLY, its not self obvious why those with mental illness struggle with pretty much every thing in life from social to physical.

100% Yes agree with that. If you have a mental illness you are the biggest outcast ever. If you last 5 limbs you have a better chance of people treating you better then those that have a variety of mental illnesses.

The have amitted to the lasers but are rhe sharks wearing them still classified?