Do you really believe this shit or are you just (badly) playing devil's advocate?
"He spreads out the northern [skies] over empty space; he suspends the earth over nothing.""
What about the southern skies? Did you read my explanation about why somebody talking about the Earth back then should say it's either suspended over nothing (or a infinite column of elephants, which is basically the same)? Why is it suspended? Earth is not suspended, not even over nothing, or, if suspended, it is suspended on the Sun.
"He wraps up the waters in his clouds, yet the clouds do not burst under their weight""
Which is an obviety, even 2500 years ago. Haven't you ever been within a low enough cloud you call it mist? Isn't it obviously suspended waters that somehow do not burst under their weight? It would have been better if an explanation on WHY they do no burst under their weight had been added.
"He draws up the drops of water, which distill as rain to the streams; the clouds pour down their moisture and abundant showers fall on mankind"
What appears to be a very basic description of the hydrologic cycle."
What appears to be a very basic description of the hydrologic cycle *as already known back then* and lacks a critical aspect, that of being a cycle: "...and the water of the seas get transformed back into moisture which forms the clouds". What a pity, his divine description lack the only non-obvious step worth mentioning.
"Have you entered into the springs of the sea or walked in the recesses (valleys) of the deep?""
Sorry? This imperatively means "the seas have no sources (false), I can think of a valley so deep I can't think of its depth (unworthy)".
"Canst thou bind the sweet influences of Pleiades, or loose the bands of Orion? Canst thou bring forth Mazzaroth in his season? or canst thou guide Arcturus with his sons?"
Which only means: "can you influence what you already know about the skies and alter their course?" Quite poetic but irrelevant since the answer is "of course not". Much more impressive would have been "but of course not, UNLESS you preach the proper pray: just say 'there's no god but the real God that happens to be Yawhe', and then the immutable bands of Orion will get loose on the spot". This, alas, isn't included within the text.
"there should be a decaying factor to that as more and more of this comes up"
Yes, like "given a vague enough assertion and a stupid enough mind, you'll be able to make a doughnut look like Saturn's rings". Is that your point?