Comment Re:Great (Score 1) 318
I wouldn't want to be the one answering the phones at the first station that turns off its analog signal voluntarily.
Which is another way of saying you can forget about that gradual transition part.
I wouldn't want to be the one answering the phones at the first station that turns off its analog signal voluntarily.
Which is another way of saying you can forget about that gradual transition part.
Oh please. Let me guess, you live in a desert area.
The US is in the bottom half by population density. http://www.worldatlas.com/aatlas/populations/ctydensityh.htm
2/3 of people without broadband is meaningless. This is not the same population set as the people without access, because it includes all the people with access who choose not to get broadband.
The better question is, what percentage of people without broadband access want it?
Who is to say each request is for a different person? Perhaps the people the police are after are using multiple online identities.
It also wouldn't be surprising if the same identity requests were repeated.
A third possibility is a request for the identity of possible victims.
Finally, evidence collected is not always enough for an arrest, much less a conviction. This doesn't mean an investigation isn't warranted.
Not to say the information shouldn't come with a cost, but the hit miss ratio may not be nearly as bad as you think.
Try to exist between Open and Closed and you will get torn to pieces by their gravity.
Sounds like you are talking about IBM there, except they seem to be doing well with that model.
I fully expect congress to continue spending my descendants money on corporate bailouts - because the same bums that have been doing this got re-elected.
1994 - The last congress to balance a budget.
Having it setup for 7-9 mph over the limit (or perhaps only 5) would likely work out better.
Factorials were someone's attempt to make math LOOK exciting.