Well, your nickname suggests that you might speak swedish, so it would make my previous comment not that funny for you :) Is this an issue of mistranslation, or did you miss the relevant parts ?
In the court ruling, the relevant part seems to be pages 33-34/41, and here are excerpts (and I guess it answers my question):

(All translations are by Google translate, corrected for a few obvious mistakes, including typos in the swedish text)

Damages for harm
[...]
Market disruption has been valued at SEK 500 000.

Damage to the film's reputation
Reviewed by a film greatly affected by the technical quality of sound and image, as it appears in. A movie is made available first in the context of the technical conditions are best , cinema or dvd / bluray and then television and legal download services . Seeing an illegally downloaded movie , often at the computer screen with significantly lower resolution than the dvd / bluray and with substandard sound, impairs movie experience significantly. Anyone who has seen any of the illegally downloaded movies father typically a worse movie experience than those who have seen the original and this affects the ratings given on internet forums of those who have seen the illegal films . These reviews are spread very quickly on the internet and father a big impact. All this means an injury to the film's reputation. This damage is valued at SEK 300 000.

Material damage
A film being illegally made available in a manner and in a form that is completely contrary to the creators and rightholders vision implies a moral damage. This is valued at SEK 50 000.

What part of:

can't you understand ? :)

In preview mode, UTF-8 codes for å, ä and ö are displayed correctly. I used HTML entities in this note.

That could be a great idea, as long as he can get the copies back :)

Source (yes, I replaced "English" by "American")

See also noble lie.

And Muphry's law still applies :)

Well, there's a lot of it :) Do you have (links to) specific documents that you think are explicit?

Is the "individual" explicitly distinguished from a mobilisable citizen / reservist?

Which basically is what the Swiss army is, right ? Civilians with a military training than can be gathered / mobilized quickly when in need. If feel that he "established" distinction is only meaningful in the context of a modern state / army (as an example London police was established in 1829, replacing a "disorganized system of parish constables and watchmen").

My understanding is that the opposition is between states militias and federal standing army, not between civilians and either form of government. From Wikipedia, the amendment was basically written to please the anti-federalists.

No, it's just a misunderstanding, in that they understand "freedom" as "the right to bear arms".
Which, by the way, is itself a misunderstanding about an amendment whose goal was to ensure a militia roughly in the same sense as the Swiss army.
The delusion would be about thinking that a gun gives you a good chance against an armoured tank.

00:19 via the light guides
03:20 standard version ... s/doesn’t fit your/doesn't feature/
04:20 s/while variable displays and variable technology/while wearable displays and wearable technology now took up
05:02 at DroidCon (guessing)
06:43 view that you just want, so, a
s/we are the only company in the world/we are the only currently in the world/

You might want to get some inspiration from reddit / imgur cableporn sections.

Posting an off topic comment in the top thread without reading TFA / TFS ?

You'll feel right at home :)

I also feel the need to point out that your last post was from 2011-01-09, so it's not been 3 years yet :)

I guess that they're trying to solve the mythical man-month conundrum by having women instead.

What about wrapped in a flag on a Harley, distributing Bibles, cheeseburgers and credit cards ? :)

Reading the comments, many people are confused.

If this can help people doing less off-by-one errors ;) : cardinal vs ordinal vs nominal.

Depending on the language, an element in an array is referenced by either its ordinal value (1st element, 2nd element), or the cardinal value corresponding to an offset, that is, a difference counted in elements between the start of the array (1st element) and the considered element (0 position between requested element and start element, 1 position between requested element and start element).

Nominal values are used in enumerations and map/dictionaries (sets of key-values).

You never heard of Longhorn, did you ? :)