There are vulnerabilities IN Telnet ?
And I thought Telnet WAS a vulnerability...
It's vulnerabilities all the way down, I guess.

Whatever takes slashdot "editors" to enhance the dullest stories to flamefests: loaded questions, misrepresentations, blatant errors, typos, dupes, general trolling, etc.
You know you like it.

Flash IDE ?
Is that a parallel ATA solid-state drive ?

Apparently Bill Gates can't distinguish currency from cash...

You mean, like that?

Yes.

You call that cornal mass? You're feeling poetic in the bathroom.

FYI, 2fuf was joking.

Will the next version be Firefox64 ?
When will we go back to Firefox ONE ?

AFAIK, PhotoCD uses JPEG. It's just that it's JPEG's hierarchical mode, that nobody else uses. (See my other post)

Nope. It was already solved by the JPEG's hierarchical mode, more than twenty years ago. You're limited to scaled sizes that are the inverse of a power of 2 of the full size, but on the other hand the client wouldn't even need to inform the server and just proceed with a partial download, up to the point where it has enough data for the desired resolution.

What are you trying to do? Referring to? It's a completely different technology!
Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time!

Tetsuoooo !!!!

(Couldn't he have credited the music ?)

You're joking, but they're doing exactly that

or those that didn't notice.