Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re: Great step! (Score 1) 148

To clarify I fully understand why startSSL do this, they are a buisness and they need to make money and they are certainly the best value widely recognised CA I have found.

I just don't think using startSSLs limited free certs as a rebuttal to claims that SSL increases costs for website operators is reasonable. Either you pay to get the wildcard certs or you pay to get extra IPv4 addresses or some combination of the two.

Comment Re:It's a TRAP! (Score 2) 175

The problem is not so much sending encrypted mail. The problem is sending signed mail or receiving encrypted mail. In those cases you need to provide your private key to the mail software.

If the mail software is running on a third party server then that means handing your private key over to them. If the mail software is javascript in a browser then the javascript could be written to keep the private key in the browser but there is a significant risk of the javascript being quietly substituted.

Comment Re: It's a TRAP! (Score 2) 175

You know what ADK is? A back door. So, either they're encrypting it twice (once with your key, once with the other), or they've poked holes in the encryption and it is complete garbage.

The usual way to do multi-recpiant encryptions is you encyrpt the message with a freshly generated symmetric session key. Then you encrypt the sesssion key multiple times with the recipiants public keys.

but it assumes you have 100% explicit trust in the agent who has the ADK

Indeed it does, in security there is always a balance between keeping prying eyes out and keeping records available to those with legitimate reason to access them.

Comment Re:It's a TRAP! (Score 4, Insightful) 175

It didn't but yahoo is a webmail provider and webmail kinda implies that the provider will either be storing the key or at the very least be able to access it by tweaking some javascript a litte.

The reason PGP is difficult for the plebs is that secure encryption requires you to take responsibility for your own key management and ensure to the best of your ability that the key does not leave devices you control (if you are really paranoid you don't even put it on an internet connected machine). If you leave key management up to a third party then your whole security becomes dependent on them.

Comment Re:harddrive speed (Score 1) 110

What games did they test? I've certainly seen games where a SSD made a BIG difference to loading times (roller coaster tycoon 3 springs to mind)

If the game just wants to load a big block of predetermined data from a sequential set of locations in a data file then HDD is fine, the problem comes when due to either lack of optimisation or the open/flexible nature of the game it needs to load lots of small peices in a non-sequential manner than a SSD makes a big difference.

Comment Re:StartSSL or DANE (Score 2) 148

You mean like StartSSL?

Hardly an official service, just a commerical CA that hands out freebies to some but not all sites that ask for them and puts technical restritions on those freebies which push people to either buy the commercial products or spend more on hosting (do I pay for n extra n IPv4 addresses or do I pay for a wildcard cert).

Or what about DANE [wikipedia.org], which stores TLS certificates in DNSSEC?

Sadly not implemented anywhere near widely enough to be useful.

Comment Re: Great step! (Score 4, Informative) 148

They do BUT

1: their rules on who can get the free certs seem to be varied and arbitary. I've seen reports of an opensource developer being given a free cert initially but then come renewal time told that merely having a donation button makes their site count as "ecommerce" and therefore ineligable
2: they make the expiry artifically short (the CA industry as a whole does this but startSSLs free certs are epecially bad),
3: they refuse to renew certs until just before they expire and refuse to reissue certs without revoking the old one.
4: each free cert only covers a domain and one hostname under that domain (e.g. bar.com and foo.bar.com). This effectively means you end up needing one IP per hostname you want SSL on (until IE on XP becomes insignificant anyway).

It's nice that there is a free (as in beer) option for some people but it's also clearly got a number of artificial restrictions on it to push people towards their paid options.

Comment Re:Microsoft (Score 1) 267

Microsoft replaced these super nodes with dedicated servers when they bought skype, in order to lift the bandwidth constraints and increase the call quality for these routed connections.

I suspect the bad PR from "abusing" the bandwidth of those dumb enough to run skype on an open internet connection where it could act as a router node was also an issue.

Comment Re:LOL, so why not use theirs? (Score 1) 195

Coal to gas conversion is pretty easy (though the result won't be as efficient as a combined cycle plant desgined to run on GAS). You just have to add some gas jets and gas piping to the combustion chamber. The design of the boiler and it's operating pressure can stay much the same and any extra physical space requirements are minimal.

That doesn't mean coal to other things will be anywhere near as easy even if the fundamental "boiling water drives steam tubine" bit remains. You have to think of the physical location requirements of the new steam source, the steam pressures it can provide without overheating (AIUI nuclear power plants tend to run at lower temperature/pressure than coal fired ones).

In the case of fusion it is expected that to achive breakeven fusion plants will have to be BIG.

Comment Re:Who'd buy a Tek? (Score 1) 273

A scope is really not that useful for many things these days.

I disagree, a scope is the go-to tool for poking around an electronic system that isn't working as you expect checking which signals are doing what you think they should be doing and which are not.

A logic analyser does have advantages over a scope (more channels, more decode capabilities) but it won't tell you that the IO voltage is wrong or that a line is sitting at intermediate levels because of conflicting drive.

Slashdot Top Deals

Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way. -- Henry Spencer

Working...