There is no snow in Copenhagen.

Do you want us to use Flash instead? O! Enlighten us, wise one, about the numerous other languages that are available for web browsers!

He got to the front page of Slashdot. I don't think I need to say more.

Aye, commie, ya wanna live like we doin' where we liv', ya better get rid of tha' commie attitude of yours.

You are a truly hilarious fellow, I got to say that. By the way, 'freedom' is the amount of things you can do, not what titles people have. The queen is not even a referee, she cannot actually do anything. She is just a formality. She cannot oust the parliament or veto a law.

She is a care-over from an older era, and we have changed the laws so she is just an expensive figurehead. So rather than talking about 'freedom' and 'universal suffrages' (concepts you clearly do not understand), you should talk about whether it is the right way to spend a government's money. Then again, a president isn't cheap either, I hear.

What does the queen have to do with anything? She is just a figurehead.

Do you even know what the word 'universal suffrage' means? Last time I checked, all people have the right to vote in Canada. In fact, as far as I know (and I might be wrong though), in Canada they don't take away your right to vote if you are convicted of a crime.

Are you trolling? Because I am not entirely sure if you are, but I feel like responding otherwise.

If it is by design - as you claim - then how come Mozilla is pushing that Firefox 7 will use between 30-40% less RAM. I am not claiming Firefox is perfect, but there is no need to spread FUD.

Maybe you should stop using Yahoo Mail. This isn't the 90s. And maybe get an operating system that can actually manage memory.

I sincerely hope they do not. Besides your peevees such as the new schedule release and your claimed RAM hogging (something which was also the case in 3.6), Firefox has gotten increasingly faster since 3.6 (my apologies for not providing a source on this, but I do recall seeing benchmarks to this effect; although, in fairness, 4 introduced multithreading which causes some slowdowns with single threading which 3.6 handled better, resulting in a percieved slowness of 4 compared to 3.6, but the issue did not persist in 5 (but few compare 3.6 to 5, people seem to do comparison between versions next to one another)).

I use Firefox because it is the only browser that is customisable enough to fit my needs. Furthermore, I admire Mozilla for sticking to their principles. I do not for a second doubt that Chrome or Opera is faster than Firefox. Or more stable. I use Opera to run Flash and Chrome to run Java Applets. But for my main, every day use, Firefox comes out on top.

Not until you take it from my cold dead hands. Also, it is excellent for nose picking. And you can pretend you are so rich that you have a device to pick your nose. Next up; hire a nose picker!

Not if I beat you to it and enter those websites myself! Hah! Who's laughing now?!

Also, the Republicans are the minority in the Senate. Woop woop woop. Sounds like a mishap.

Or in a cabinet meeting.

*cough* paradoxplaza.com/thewesterfront/2010/9/the-drm-dilemma *cough*

What the summary fails to mention is that the company still will actively be looking for pirates on torrent sites. Paradox Interactive's approach is not to bother at all, but rather provide those with unique CD-keys additional benefits.