Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Gates Foundation (Score 1) 286

Umm, we are. Every time you buy a computer from a large vendor, it WILL have windows preinstalled.

Well, literally, I'm not buying that.

Government where I live is big on OSS, interoperability formats and all, so no conspiracy theories there. And consumers always buy what is best for them. This monopoly thing is old already.

If you think big vendors should 'escape the microsoft tax' selling linux, think again. The casual user would be lost and end up with a useless machine. That doesn't make them money. And of course there's the Apple choice, with no 'microsoft tax' whatsoever, and quite a few people are happy with that. Just because you don't like other people choices doesn't mean they're being forced to choose that way.

And regardless how Mr. Gates obtained his money, he could be sipping martinis and watching it burn, but isn't. Of his own will he spends it with a purpose beneficial to us all. That part is always worth cheering.

Comment Re:Validity (Score 1) 571

Then we could trust these people to make scientific determinations about humans the way we can trust engineers to make decisions about bridges, or judges to make decisions about law.

Or trust lawyers about lawyering, or politicians about politics. Sure we can.

I may or may not have a particular nitpick about the "scientific method" behind psychology, but I'm certain your argument doesn't help because the analogy doesn't go beyond bridge building and the nightmarish math involved to the soft sciences. For the hard sciences, the physics is either right or wrong, and bridges stand or fail, regardless of the engineers outlook on life.

That's not to say judges or whatever are unqualified. But it's very hard for them to be wrong, because their opinion is what actually sets the precedent for what is right. And no objective error means no correction, no evolution, no science.

At least some psychologists know their field is highly subjective, and their science is very, very hard to do.

Comment Re:Can somebody say (Score 1) 514

Now imagine how well off we'd be if we spent 480 billion per year on solar power, and only 2 billion on foreign wars.

Good point. Our new Chinese overlords would let us all sit in lounge chairs and enjoy our free electricity all day long!

Well, they actually would, since I hear there's quite a few chinese around, and they don't like being in the dark.

On the other hand, a big marching army carrying torches would be quite scary at night.

Databases

Sun May Begin Close Sourcing MySQL Features 509

An anonymous reader writes "From the MySQL User's Conference, Sun has announced, and former CEO Marten Mickos has confirmed, that Sun will be close sourcing sections of the MySQL code base. Sun will begin with close sourcing the backup solutions to MySQL, and will continue with more advanced features. With Oracle owning Innodb, and it being GPL, does this mean that MySQL will be removing it to introduce these features? Sun has had a very poor history of actually open sourcing anything."
Programming

Getting Accurate Specifications for Software? 147

spiffcow asks: "I design internal software for users that are largely computer-illiterate, and obtaining accurate specs for these programs has become a huge challenge. In the most recent instance, I asked for detailed specs on what an accounting program should do (i.e. accounting rules, calculation methods, and so forth), and received a Word document mock-up of an input screen, complete with useless stickers. This seems to be the norm around here. When I asked my boss (the head Sales manager) for specs, he responded saying that it was my responsibility to determine what was needed. How do I convey to the users that, in order to develop the software they want, I need detailed, accurate specs?"

Slashdot Top Deals

For God's sake, stop researching for a while and begin to think!

Working...