Comment Next on the docket... (Score 1) 114
She also accused Lenovo and Superfish of invading her privacy and making money by studying her Internet browsing habits.
Is she going to sue her ISP for doing the same thing?
She also accused Lenovo and Superfish of invading her privacy and making money by studying her Internet browsing habits.
Is she going to sue her ISP for doing the same thing?
This is an RFID only card - "VISA PayWave" - not a smart card so there's no chip+pin. Using the hole-punch on the RFID chip was very satisfying. Contact-less CCs are a gimmick to encourage thoughtless purchasing.
One of my RFID-enabled cards came with a blocking sleeve for it. We've had these for years in Canada.
As I posted earlier, I blocked the RFID chip in my VISA card with a hole-punch and hammer. It's very secure now.
EMV is NOT contactless. If your new card(s) include electrical contacts, It's EMV
Cool, cool, cool. I'm not a fan of contact-less and don't really see the point/benefit. My VISA card has Pay Wave - or, rather, had until I got a hole punch and hammer...
While it may have been unthinkable 20 years ago, Java and JavaScript are now locked in a battle of sorts for control of the programming world.
Hyperbolic much? Ya, no. It's still unthinkable.
The contacts are still only about 1.5 millimeters thick...
Still only? Beer coasters are thinner than that.
Lawyer: Ha ha
There's actually an Emacs command for that.
I have no idea what "the truth" is, but I don't think it is black and white.
It's increasingly apparent that the color of "the truth" is green - $$$.
And if the indenting is, somehow, lost or messed up, your program logic is toast. Not so with other languages. So, yes, relying solely on white space for correct program logic is a potential weakness. It's mind boggling that you can see, or admit, this little fact.
In a perfect world you're correct and it shouldn't be an issue, but the world isn't perfect. The strong Python coding standard means nothing after this simple vi command: 1,$s/^ *//
To have any level of quality in the code delivering a web app, even a 'simple' one, you're going to have to use an html5 browser with javascript enabled.
"have to use" ? - Citation please.
If you prefer not to, I prefer you not use my apps
So, you're a snob. (Your apps probably reflect this too.)
When I select 20 items to be removed, I don't have to wait for 20 page reloads on a slow connection.
A snob who's never heard of CheckBoxes and a Submit button on a Form - which will (re)load faster than your Javascript/Ajax laden pages.
Go back to the old days? Hell no.
Newer isn't always better - newbie
I don't care how pretty and dynamic a site is if the user experience sucks.
If I had to pick the single most annoying thing, it would sites that require Javascript to perform even the simplest thing, like ButtonPress or to display the main article text, that can be performed with straight HTML. I mean - seriously.
Oh you were actually serious. Well, then...
Examining this thread and your comments as a whole, it's a shame you can't attempt make technical arguments without resorting to demeaning the other person. This speaks volumes about your character and the strength of your arguments - or lack thereof with respect to both.
Best wishes.
Settings that change language semantics? God no. A line of code should have exactly one meaning no matter what context it is written in. How the hell can I understand code written by other developers if I have to keep checking for settings like this?
I know, right? But I kid you not: Strong Spaces
[ I got modded "Funny" for that, but hope that's just because "Scary" isn't an option. ]
You are hilarious. I wish I could mod you +1 Funny. Oh, to live in the fantasy world in which you, barely coherently, described, where nothing ever goes wrong and/or you never have to deal with foreign code (person, editor, source, etc...). I especially liked the bit where you deny, then acknowledge the language's failings. Man-o-man you have a bright future as a comedian - because if you were serious, it's obviously *not* programming. Perhaps as a Script Kiddy, but not actual programming.
Well done Krusty; well done.
(And while we are at it, I have done real work in > 20 different languages of various language types, so I have a bit of an intuition whether one is harder to use or not...)
Careful Grasshopper. I have 30+ years as a Unix system programmer/admin and Unix/Windows software developer on - literally - just about every type of system there is from PCs to Cray supercomputers and probably have more programming experience than you, in more languages. I've worked at NASA, The New York Times and, presently, a large defense contractor - all in both research and production environments.
That aside, you haven't countered my points at all. Sure, perhaps you find Python easier to read, write and clearer because it's more compact (that last point is extremely debatable). Those are all good points, but you haven't (and can't) offer any argument that white-space block delimiting offers any actual enhanced programming benefit over brace and other delimited languages. There are, in fact, are many, many posts in this thread alone demonstrating clear and practical problems with Python indenting.
And, in point of fact, the Python and Nim language developers have specifically stated that their languages use the off-side rule because they believe it to be "more elegant", so I can blame them for not thinking beyond that to more practical issues. Issues that apparently plague real people, doing real work, in diverse environments that would not and/or are not issues in brace/other delimited languages.
Don't let your love for the language blind you to its problems or shortcomings.
THEGODDESSOFTHENETHASTWISTINGFINGERSANDHERVOICEISLIKEAJAVELININTHENIGHTDUDE