Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:More proof (Score 1) 667

I don't live anywhere near a sea, and furthermore, we have long, long brutal winters here. And there's lot of people living in places like me. So.. tell me again why I would fight against rising temperatures?

So rising seas won't *directly* affect you, but, even in your area, as temperatures rise, there are probably plants and animals that could die off, local aquifers may dry up (due to changes in rainfall patterns)... In addition, unless you live in a completely self-contained/sustaining bubble, you get things from other places in the country/world... Ultimately, eventually, we're all in this together.

Comment Re:More proof (Score 1) 667

I wonder how they will feel about their lifestyles in 100 years, when they have to keep buying longer and longer snorkels just to get around in the non-tangible seawater surrounding their homes?

Do you have any idea what a snorkel is, or how it works? Have you ever used a snorkel? If you can't understand the physics of snorkel use, how can you possibly make the judgement that anthropogenic warming is real?

Ya, I know how a snorkel works and the physics involved - it was a joke, lighten up.

Comment Re:More proof (Score 1) 667

the consensus view of the American public is that they do not want to sacrifice their lifestyles for the environment, especially in this case since the benefits are non-tangible

I wonder how they will feel about their lifestyles in 100 years, when they have to keep buying longer and longer snorkels just to get around in the non-tangible seawater surrounding their homes? The U.S. Navy, however, is taking climate change seriously: U.S. Navy bracing for climate change

Comment Re:Misleading summary as usual (Score 1) 323

Leigh Lewis, superintendent of the Triad district, told me that if a student refuses to cooperate, the district could presumably press criminal charges.

I'm hard pressed to see how the *school district* could press charges as they are not a party to, or harmed by, the alleged accusations.

Comment Re:Can anyone think of (Score 1) 204

benefited enough people

It has hurt enough people that it is not suicide.

Citation seriously needed - from a reputable source. On balance, if you investigate this honestly, I suspect you'll find that the ACA has helped more than it has hurt. Sure, some people have had to pay higher premiums, but it is almost always for better coverage, and many people complaining didn't have any insurance, but now have coverage - especially people needing Medicaid. Ironically, people in Red states have benefited more than those in Blue states.

Here's a citation: Is the Affordable Care Act Working?, from 10/2014, quoting:

  1. Has the percentage of uninsured people been reduced?
    Answer: Yes, the number of uninsured has fallen significantly.
  2. Has insurance under the law been affordable?
    Answer: For many, yes, but not for all.
  3. Did the Affordable Care Act improve health outcomes?
    Answer: Data remains sparse except for one group, the young.
  4. Will the online exchanges work better this year than last?
    Answer: Most experts expect they will, but they will be tested by new challenges.
  5. Has the health care industry been helped or hurt by the law?
    Answer: The law mostly helped, by providing new paying patients and insurance customers.
  6. How has the expansion of Medicaid fared?
    Answer: Twenty-three states have opposed expansion, though several of them are reconsidering.
  7. Has the law contributed to a slowdown in health care spending?
    Answer: Perhaps, but mainly around the edges.

Comment Re:So...don't be disposable. (Score 3, Interesting) 271

This sounds a little insensitive, but, don't be disposable. You're a Windows admin. Great. So are a million other people. If you're a Windows admin who also knows some programming, there are maybe 250,000 people with your skill set. If you add in that you know some Linux, maybe 100,000 people.

What I'm saying is, if you want to be safer than the average employee, don't be average. Enhance your skill set.

Everyone is disposable. All companies care about is $$$.

Here's my experience, working for a *large* corporation... I have 25+ years (14 at my current company) as a Unix system programmer and system administrator with commensurate Linux and Windows experience - I've worked on just about every type of system from PCs to Cray super-computers. I am currently the lead developer of a three-person team on a cross-platform utility (Solaris,RedHat,Ubuntu,Windows) of about 300k lines of code in about 10 programming languages - 75% of which is my code - that is heavily used by our customers.

I was almost laid off last summer, simply because I was one of the most expensive people in my category of people on the contract. Even pleadings from my two managers to the higher ups that laying me off was inappropriate had no effect. The *only* thing that changed their minds was the realization that I also worked on *another* contract onto which some of my work could be (properly) charged.

Comment Train vs. hire (Score 1) 271

They're deciding that it's faster and cheaper to chuck people overboard and find new ones than it is to retrain them. The economics of cutting rather than training may seem simple, but it's a more complex calculation than most people believe.

I would tend to agree that the calculation is more complex, but err on the side of retraining current employees. Learning a new skill, especially within your field of study, isn't often that difficult, but, for a new employee, learning the company's policies, procedures and well as documentation, development, build and delivery (etc) processes and the company culture is much more complex and, I would argue, more important. A wiz-bang employee that's not well integrated into the environment is a bigger problem than someone simply needing to learn another programming language. All that assumes, of course, that companies actually care, which, in my experience, large companies don't. "Employees are our most valuable asset" - my ass.

Comment Re:Rent seeking (Score 2, Insightful) 570

indicating Windows would be software that users subscribe to, rather than buy outright

No thanks. Just like with Adobe CS, it looks like it's time to buy up some licenses before they disappear. I have no interest in renting my software.

Renting software, especially non-essential software, is one thing, but renting the OS, without which the system won't even function, is more akin to renting ransom-ware. (good move M$, he said sarcastically)

If, on the other hand, the system will still function - at full capacity - but just w/o further updates, then I predict many, many out-of-date systems (because people are fugal) - that is, until, more complete uses of "trusted computing" take hold and routers and/or network services deny access to systems that are not fully-patched. (off in the distance, he hears RMS giggling and muttering "wait for it...")

Also, how is this subscription service suppose to work? Am I suppose to give M$ my credit card number for recurring charges? I don't think so - although I imagine that's what many Apple consumers do (I don't know).

Comment Just great... (Score 1) 43

"So we could deliver an update for a Heartbleed or Shellshock vulnerability, completely independently of the lawnmower control app that would come from the lawnmower company" Shuttleworth said.

... then I can have one system with both a patched container and an un-patched container. "Is your system up-to-date?" ... "Sort of." Now I can look forward to downloading the same patches N times, once for each container - thanks Mark, that's snappy!

Comment Slightly off topic... (Score 3, Informative) 136

Poor controls mean that antibiotics are leaking out and getting into drinking water. They are in the fish and cattle that we eat, and global travel and exports mean bacteria are traveling.

And those fish, cattle and even people are getting those antibiotics for *free* - seriously impacting our bottom line and tight-fisted control over drugs that, in reality, don't really cost as much as we say they do to research and manufacture, but we sell for a metric fuck-ton of cash.

According to this NY Times article, $2.6 Billion to Develop a Drug? New Estimate Makes Questionable Assumptions are an "estimate that drug companies could have made more money if they used their research investment for things other than drug development."

In both of these announcements, a significant amount of the costs to develop the drugs were opportunity, or time, costs. They are the returns that might be expected, but that investors went without, while a drug was in development. When a drug company invests in research and development, it is tying up money that could otherwise be invested elsewhere. In this announcement, the Tufts Center says that $1.2 billion of the $2.6 billion is time costs.

The end of the article notes:

In 2010, a systematic review of studies that looked at the cost of drug development was published in Health Policy. The review found 13 articles, with estimates ranging from $161 million to $1.8 billion (in 2009 dollars). Obviously, methodology matters.

That's a far cry from $2.6 Billion.

Comment Re:Real, real, real... (Score 1) 98

Movie isn't out yet. If 200 security experts said that it's fairly accurate, can you at least *wait* to judge it?

And yes, it makes sense there would be physical fighting.Virtual altercations often become physical.

I seriously doubt *any* of those 200 security experts have flown off to Hong Kong with a glock and hot Asian chick strapped to their sides and ninja'd their way through a bunch of bad guys - though I'm sure they've dreamed about doing that.

Furthermore, only Hollywood would have the must-have elite hacker be Chris Hemsworth. Don't get me wrong, I like Chris, in roles where speaking and the ability to convincingly portray highly technical knowledge isn't important, but if one is going the action-movie route, it would be much more interesting to have the character be a "regular guy" - actually like Kevin Poulsen - thrown into an exceptional situation like this, rather than watch Thor run around saving the day yet again.

I stand by my preemptive review (and the 31% review on Rotten Tomatoes).

Slashdot Top Deals

"The four building blocks of the universe are fire, water, gravel and vinyl." -- Dave Barry

Working...