Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Is this ironic? (Score 2) 686

Is it just me or does this seem ironic?
Generally it seems Millenials(the ones I know and work with) are more accepting of surveillance by the government and corporations.

Gen X and the Boomers have more of the 20th century leftover attitude that Americans have a right to privacy, and that the blood and treasure spent to keep the "World Safe for Democracy" by the "Greatest Generation", etc, The Constitution, etc, means we have those rights.

You would think Millenials would be more apathetic to the whole Snowden thing(which has been my experience talking to people about it). The attitude I've encountered is the usual, "I'm just on FB posting videos, etc, playing games, etc", "I'm not doing anything wrong", "why should I care?"

My experience is that Gen X and the Boomers are much more paranoid and concerned about rights, etc;

Comment Re:concerned about **too many** homeschooling?? (Score 4, Funny) 616

> they were concerned that too many students would be forced into home schooling.

With the piss poor job schools have been doing lately, that might not be a bad thing for parents to bond and spend more time with their chilldren's investment success for their future.

Nah, it's easier to pass the job off to someone else who doesn't give a crap about your child's future and is only doing it for the money.

For the money?!?
WUT?

Comment Re:So what? (Score 1) 407

I don't get it. I really don't.

What is there to get?
Why else do you think pharmaceutical abuse has risen so dramatically in the last 20 years or so?
Money, that is why.

Look at how much advertising there is on commercial television and on the internet for pharmaceuticals.
BigPharma has bought and paid for Congress and used the media to push its agenda of everyone having to take some kind of pill, all the time:
"Just ask your doctor".

Comment Re:Post-labor economics (Score 1) 289

Do yourself a favor and read "Manna" by Marshall Brain.
An excerpt:

America was no different from a third world nation. With the arrival of robots, tens of millions of people lost their minimum wage jobs and the wealth concentrated so quickly. The rich controlled America's bureaucracy, military, businesses and natural resources, and the unemployed masses lived in terrafoam, cut off from any opportunity to change their situation. There was the facade of "free elections," but only candidates supported by the rich could ever get on the ballot. The government was completely controlled by the rich, as were the robotic security forces, the military and the intelligence organizations. American democracy had morphed into a third world dictatorship ruled by the wealthy elite.

Ultimately, you would expect that there would be riots across America. But the people could not riot.
The terrorist scares at the beginning of the century had caused a number of important changes. Eventually, there were video security cameras and microphones covering and recording nearly every square inch of public space in America. There were taps on all phone conversations and Internet messages sniffing for terrorist clues. If anyone thought about starting a protest rally or a riot, or discussed any form of civil disobedience with anyone else, he was branded a terrorist and preemptively put in jail. Combine that with robotic security forces, and riots are impossible.

Comment Re:Whatsisname is...mistaken (Score 1) 289

No. HUMANS can be forced to read off a script but MACHINES suck at anything more complex than "Did you say "yes"".

Tell that to Watson in 2020.

Exactamundo!
For some reason people have a hard time extrapolating where technology is heading.
Think about the computing power in your phone compared to even ten years ago and it isn't hard to see where things are going.

Comment Re:Post-labor economics (Score 1) 289

I'm sure the "think tanks" out there have been mulling over this for the last few years. I know they are thinking about a "dole" system, similar to what Switzerland has been thinking about. Problem is, where will the government get the money to support millions of unemployed? You think corporations(who will eventually takeover) are going to do it?

The reality is, in the not too distant future, those 20-30% thresholds of unemployed will be met.
What happens then?

What happens when the millions of uneducated immigrants in the US(and elsewhere) who have been doing low skilled labor are displaced?
What happens when the millions of educated citizens in the US(and elsewhere) who have been doing skilled labor are displaced?

The good news for those in control is they will have robots to enforce their will.

Comparing what is now taking place to the Industrial Revolution is ridiculous, and everyone knows it.
This is a "Brave New World" we are entering.

Slashdot Top Deals

If you think the system is working, ask someone who's waiting for a prompt.

Working...