Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Russian rocket motors (Score 1) 62

Russia would like for us to continue gifting them with cash for 40-year-old missle motors, it's our own government that doesn't want them any longer. For good reason. That did not cause SpaceX to enter the competitive process, they want the U.S. military as a customer. But it probably did make it go faster.

Also, ULA is flying 1960 technology, stuff that Mercury astronauts used, and only recently came up with concept drawings for something new due to competitive pressure from SpaceX. So, I am sure that folks within the Air Force wished for a better vendor but had no choice.

Comment Re:What a guy (Score 1) 389

If that's recovery, I don't want to see what your economy would look like if it was in the dump. Your "recovery" is yet another bubble, with the printing press pretty much propping you up and the fact that you can, by holding the de facto international currency in your hands, essentially tax the world by forcing them to keep your inflation artificially low so they don't sit on worthless toilet paper (aka dollar reserves).

Seriously, if the US was any other country, their rating would have bombed by now due to an economy that can not support the amount of money being pumped out aimlessly.

Ok, not true, it ain't aimlessly. But aimed at the by some margin wrongest targets. Instead of trying to use that money to help your economy recover, you prop up failed banks and failing businesses that are deemed "too big to fail". Mostly because a government take over is anathema to your economical dogma, so you pump money into corporations which is not used to create jobs or spur the economy but is siphoned away by those that actually caused all this. And these people are still not held accountable for it, quite the opposite. They're pretty much assured that no matter how much they damage the economy and abuse it for their personal gains, we'll bail them out.

That's hard to trump. I'm not convinced that it can't be done worse, I'm actually pretty sure a Republican could come up with some ways to fuck this up even worse. But I hope we can agree on this being kinda far away from any sensible solution to the problem at hand.

Comment Re:Duh (Score 2) 321

You mean that's different from TV networks cutting movies left and right to make NC17 movies suitable for broadcast or "trimming" them down so they can squeeze in another ad break? Oddly, this seems to be a-ok with the studios.

Comment Re: Just another arrogant CEO (Score 2) 49

This is all off topic and the poster you replied to wasn't correct, however...

A minority of the people actively embrace it; the vast majority accept it somewhat reluctantly and go with the flow; and an even smaller minority

The simple fact is no one has data here. Magically, whoever is bitching and moaning about the other side calls out the other side as the smaller vocal minority. Convenient.

systemd is a different beast than other decisions. RedHat historically caught flak (justifiably) for releasing distributions incorporating pre-release upstream builds in fundamental places. No one argued that the components were going to be the wrong direction, just that they weren't ready yet. Red Hat ultimately 'fixed' that by reserving their brand for 'enterprise only' and recalibrating expectations around Fedora. Pulseaudio despite being ubiquitous still has a lot of discussion on how to disable it when it just doesn't work right still. NetworkManager is also close, and also is accompanied by instructions on how to revert to the 'old' way. Same for firewalld. systemd is the first decision that really forces the issue in a fundamental way that's hard to avoid. This is strangely without precedent, for something so controversial to not be in a place that could conceivably be turned off by those who don't want it.

Slashdot Top Deals

Remember, UNIX spelled backwards is XINU. -- Mt.

Working...