I'm not sure about Samsung, but find me an instance of Google suing someone without being sued first, and no Motorola before Google bought them does not count. Google has not been a patent dick.
There are also some open patent pools that will also help stop the abuses of
It's a common cause of confusion. Certain behaviours and tendencies can be attributed to specific cultures. I really wish people would realize that culture is learned, can be changed, and includes both good and bad aspects. The bad aspects of cultures should be changed, but it's touchy because it often gets ibnncorrectly equated to race.
I'm not even sure that will help. These guys have proven that they're quite
There are Android that beat iOS on user experience as well. Marketing plays a huge role.
Most people that claim high availability almost *never* make any changes to anything. The mainframe world is rife with resistance to change because of it. High availability is easy if you never change anything. Most of the outages with most systems are caused by human error, and most happen when deploying updates. High availability seems to carry a lot of weight, but usually doesn't cover all it should.
Sometimes you get all three (Linux, Android, etc), but not this time.
Good, free, but not open source.
I look at it the other way. Microsoft products do not fully work with open formats. Public institutions really should be using open formats.
Or, people that would normally buy a console but who don't want the hassle of picking a video card, making sure their wifi card works with Linux, etc.
That's the *important* difference though.
It sounds like you're agreeing with me. You'd be happier with a lighter laptop.
Valve disagrees.
ActiveX was not a good idea.
... unless your 'enterprise' (damn, I hate that term) is
Notice they're heading for an Apple-like model? Hardware margins will be fine when they only allow MS software to run on their hardware.
Our OS who art in CPU, UNIX be thy name. Thy programs run, thy syscalls done, In kernel as it is in user!
