I didn't say all cancers are radiation caused, I said we don't how many of them are. Stop putting words in to my mouth.

Stick to what I actually said.

You seem to have reading difficulty, I said twice that we should be investing in storage technologies, you seem to want to ignore that.

And you can keep lying to yourself about renewables

Do you ever do any research, are you aware that nuclear has to be subsidised, or that we have hardly put any effort in to energy mass storage tech and that storage tech can be over 90% efficient.

Why on earth would you want to use dirty nuclear power when cheap ever lasting renewables are within our reach. If US DOE says one small area of land can power the USA then obviously the rest of the planet can be run on renewables. The way things are going, solar will be as cheap as coal power.

http://blog.comparemysolar.co....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U...

"The electrical grid has ZERO energy storage"

Why do you think I said we should be investing in storage technologies?

"your side's fabricated dire predictions"

I didn't fabricate anything.

You say nuclear waste can be recycled, but right now, that is a fantasy, this is the reality:

Around the world, nuclear power plants are churning out high-level radioactive waste at a rate of knots. It's estimated that about 250,000 tonnes of the material is currently in interim storage, submerged in huge tanks of water in facilities that keep it safe -- temporarily.

But there's very little agreement on what to do with the stuff long-term, as it will remain a danger for around 100,000 years

from:
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/ar...

No I meant the awareness aspect of consciousness, it is unprovable. The only persons consciousness I can be sure of is my own. For all we know trees or machines could have consciousness, it is the magic of life and we will never know.

Conscious is were magic begins and science ends.

From my point of view you have to be pretty 'fundamentalist ' to support nuclear. Every country that has nuclear has accidents.

Why is it that pro-nuclear people always like to ignore the fact that nuclear is the most expensive option and that there is no good place to store the waste. You could sell it to the Italian mafia though, they have disposed of it in the past.

And the dangers are never sufficiently dealt with, luckily terrorists have never attempted to fly plans in to nuclear power stations with the accuracy of the plane that hit the pentagon.

Terrorists, storage, cost, earthquakes, profit motive, tsunamis, large solar flares, disgruntled nut job employees, rogue govt hackers, organised crime, I can't be bothered to go in to all of these in detail but I'm sure there are more reasons why nuclear is a bad idea.

When was the last time a coal fired power station exploded leaving land uninhabitable and the ocean unfishable and with astronomical clean-up costs?

If we put a fraction of what we spend on nuclear in to large scale energy storage R+D and implement it then we could use wind, solar, tidal etc a lot more. UK could be powered from wind alone.

What we need is a 3-strikes and you're out system - submit 3 false DMCA take-downs and any more take-downs become invalid.

Until you start giving coal power the treatment it DESERVES by killing about 200,000 people/year worldwide and 13,000 people/year in the USA alone, you have ZERO moral authority to try to destroy nuclear power for its most remote risks.

Two wrongs don't make a right.

Your argument is that we should castigate Dave for killing people because John kills more people!!!!

7 Billion people on earth, 30+% of them will die of cancer, the simple fact is we don't know how many of those 2 billion people died because of radiation but what we do know is that high powered photons can damage DNA and that can lead to cancer.

How many Fukishimas, windscales, three-mile-islands and chernobyls do we have to have before we say enough is enough. We CAN power this planet on renewables.

The United States Department of Energy (DOE) estimates that the solar energy resource in a 100-square-mile (259-square-kilometer) area of Nevada could supply the United States with all its electricity. We're talking 800 gigawatts of power, and that's using modestly efficient commercial PV modules.

Can you prove to me that you have a consciousness?

No? So for practical purposes, I should assume you don't have a consciousness then.

"Since a domain registration contract is time bound, automatic exit is not guaranteed by law."

What contract? A TOS is not a contract, a contract is a document agreed between two parties, signed by both parties and witnessed at the same time, THAT is a contract.

If it's behind a firewall and the computer is single purpose then I don't see why the OS should matter as long as you can replace the hardware when it fails.

Copyright was intended for art when it was created. And the purpose of copyright is certainly not to allow someone to take revenge by means of humiliation.

If you are letting a partner take images of you then you are, without any further agreement, letting them do what they choose with that image.

What complete and utter stinking bullshit.

Within current law, the only reasonable way to solve that is to have a contractual agreement in place first that allows you to recoup civil damages from the other party if they use the image in a way that you don't expressly consent to.

You are raving mad.

"the reasonable way to solve that is to".. be a decent human being.

I have, Twice and it was for something stupid like an external drive, yes it counted a peripheral as part of the PC like duh. I tend to upgrade bits regularly but this sets the 'reauthorise' off.

What happens after April 8th - no more reauthorise?

I visited again and my fingerprint was unique again, but yes I do hate that websites get access to info that it is private, something I don't think Mozilla really cares about - they just make token gestures towards privacy.

I think the problem with the fingerprint is that it changes too much and so is not very useful, my guess is that advertisers do not rely on this kind of fingerprinting.

Having said that, I'd install a plugin to block the upload of the info in an instant, especially fonts.

I don't mind them having a little of my time. It's the earth and health-destroying, false dream selling greed worshiping evil bullshit that I hate.

Because you can't have advertising without tracking?

I don't mind adverts, I don't like being stalked by psychopathic corporations.

Billboards, TV, radio and newspaper ads don't track people (yet) but advertisers still use them.