Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:danger vs taste (Score 1) 630

Actually it's 3 percent of other polysaccharides in HFCS and they do bizarre things to gut bacteria and metabolism.

Stop with the nonsense that HFCS is just two common sugars, that's a approximate bulk description that no science minded person should use

Comment Re:danger vs taste (Score 1) 630

You are very funny, declaring the result of an experiment you haven't done and imagining you are right. That is not the scientific way. You are wrong about the helium balloon, put that balloon into a vacuum chamber and it will pop. My My you are so silly.

Comment Re:danger vs taste (Score 1) 630

"spectrum of taste" is for culinary school. They rats responded to sucrose and saccharine. That's hardly testing with all common simple sweet chemicals, and not enough to draw any conclusion about sucralose or stevia or any other artificial sweetener.

Those would have to be tested to make a claim, and then only valid for rats

Comment Re:danger vs taste (Score 1) 630

Yes, the rat brain reacted to nervous system sensing saccharine, that's all that can be said.

You cannot make a claim for any other substance without testing.

Your quoting a sentence making invalid unscientific conclusion doesn't make that true.

Slashdot Top Deals

One man's constant is another man's variable. -- A.J. Perlis

Working...