This is a free dev kit, not an id-style open source release of the engine (title was kind of misleading).
Where did the title or summary say this was a source release? It's a free release of a dev kit for non commercial use. Which is what the summary and the links say. That you assumed it meant something other than what was explicitly stated is your own poor reading comprehension skills at work.
The URL preview at the bottom of my browser told me all I needed to know. No, I did not go there.
You mean of course designing a cool hat to be worn while using anti-gravity belt that could be invented when we understand and are able to control gravity.
I would really really REALLY like to know how they are going to deploy the fracking tether, won't we need a spaceship like the B.S. Galactica for that?
Please could anyone shed some light on this, ideas? So far no-one has even mentioned this.
I have an idea, assuming we're able to deploy a very thin cable attached to a satellite in geosync with a few thrusters capable of accelerating to maintain tension in the cable.
Then send a second spacecraft along with a few rolls of that same cable, attach both spacecraft and send down-climbing robots back to earth with the extra cables. Once they reach the floors attach the new cables somewhere near the first cable.
Repeat
Now you have a heavy mass orbiting the earth attached to a strong cable. I'm not sure but I think that if we want to haul anything up, the orbiting mass has go to be at least equal to the mass on the ground.
Click to immediate link in the summary "Terms and Conditions", in the first paragraph: "Actual speeds vary and are not guaranteed. PowerBoost provides bursts of download and upload speeds for the first 10 MB and 5 MB of a file, respectively."
You will find similar clauses in any service description for residential cable/dsl.
You are, to a great extent, correct.
However, one of the biggest problems US ISPs (Comcast, Time Warner) are getting hammered on and what is causing much of the public outcry is that the actual disparities are far outside any reasonable interpretations of the agreements.
For example, my current home ISP's service description is for up to 5mbps downstream, 256kbps upstream. Typical basic residential service, but should adequate for web browsing/email/online gaming/etc. I live in a rural area so housing density is low, but even still I don't expect to be getting max figures.
What I really didn't expect, however, was that my downstream would be closer to 1400kbps and upstream would consistently be in the range of 16-32kbps!!!
There is no reasonable argument there that my ISP is providing service at levels advertised and paid for even accounting for network congestion and throttling. The disparity is just too great, but still the company insists there is nothing wrong with the equipment or service and hides behind the "up to" clause. I am quite certain there is nothing wrong with my rig, router, or software... I'm just not getting what I'm paying for.
In your example, its clearly a trademark violation so Citibank has the right to use the normal procedures that get used when a DNS name violates their trademark and either get the domain name shut down (i.e. removed from the DNS) or handed over to Citibank.
an undisclosed agenda
looking at his other replies in this thread, i think that he works for NetZero
It has nothing to do with marketing "in a fashion", that is the definition of marketing period.
Apple could be viewed the same way.
Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (5) All right, who's the wiseguy who stuck this trigraph stuff in here?