Linux is for loser hippie neckbeards, Linux is for greedy capitalist pigs, Linux is for average Janes and Joes; Linux is for everyone.

If a site post a story and there's nobody to read it, does it cover the news?

Why would that matter?
Does your opinion on the events change depending on his skin color?

I guess pirating the video should be encouraged then.

Either love programming for it's own sake or find a different job.
Nobody sees a software engineer as a true engineer, so you'll spend a lot of time dealing with stupid people who insist they know how to do your job better than you. These include (but are not limited to); bosses, managers, HR people, sales & marketing people, customers, clients, business partners (atleast their non-IT staff).
Unless you thoroughly enjoy programming, you'll quickly burn out.

Exactly.
First learn assembly.
Only then, when you understand what a computer actually does, move onto to gradually higher level languages.
Until you finally end up with a popular language like Java or C# and can still understand what's going on instead of simply rote learning APIs.

Atleast speed cameras are regulated and operated by a government agency.
This is just a corporation randomly pointing it's finger at somebody and saying "This week, YOU must give us $20. Why? Well, because you want your internet back, don't you?".

Right... you're trying to be "hip" and "different" and absolutely don't care about being gip and different.
You got me good, you did!

A hipster is somebody who would suddenly get a different taste if (and because) you'd like their taste.
They are people who so desperately want to be seen as different that they end up all being the same.

It's like how children want to be adults, but adults don't care about being adult.
Hipsters want to be interresting, but interresting people don't care about being interresting.

It's not the features that you stare at with no idea what they do that cause a problem. As you say, a quick look at the manual can help to sort that out (though it does add to the overall cognitive load). It's all the potentially subtle things that you don't even realise are features and so never look up and don't realise that, contrary to first inspection, the code is actually doing something subtly different to what you expect.

I don't mind "internet of things" so much; it's devices using the internet without human interaction. I think the hype maxed out on that back when we were all expecting internet-connected fridges. Nowadays we actually have a few of those and are a bit more sane about what they can and cannot do.

As for "cloud"; it's just an empty marketing phrase. It cannot have a regular hypecycle, because at the end of every hypecycle is a phase of normal, sane use of the technology. There simply isn't any technology to use (other than plain internet).

I'd combine them and call it the "cloud of things" for ultimate buzzwordiness; it can mean anything.

A startup is a hectic place to be and can be very demanding, but one of the things I enjoy most about startups is that you can get from idea to implementation to testing to production within an hour.

CPU's with TSX were first releasing in June 2013. Not really "early adopter" terrain any more.

I've been using a call recorder app for about half a year now; great not only for rare cases like these, but also for replaying a conversation to get a name or phonenumber or some other detail you've forgotten.

No. How about the man who opened a strategically selected subset of Tesla's patents in order to improve the network of charging points Tesla's cars depend on?