Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Why not? (Score 1) 678

Agricultural water supply isn't tiered in some respects. They have three basic supplies. One - well water - which takes it from the aquifer. Two - historical first right water - which takes it before the rest use it. Three -state water - which pays a subsidized rate for water (and why you see all those signs on I5 in Cali) - where it's going from 1/2 the cost to 80 pct the cost currently.

Non-ag water supply is fairly similar, except most people don't have wells and pay the commercial city rate. Some places use tiered, many don't.

But they don't have as large up-end surcharges like we in the water areas like Seattle do. We charge two arms and two legs and your hair for excessive use, they charge a left foot or maybe a leg for excessive use.

Comment Re:Why not? (Score 1) 678

Actually, though, bidding is artificially constrained by money supply, so that those with wealth have more assets to bid for water than those with less.

This means that you get swimming pools and grass lawns that the ecosystem can't support.

A better method is to cap the usage per capita and let people decide what they want with it. If they really want a pool, then make them pay a lot more for the extra water wasted. As in ten times as much.

Our Seattle water supply works this way. Even rich people pay a lot more per water use above a certain amount than someone at median water use.

Comment Re:Why not? dirty desal probs (Score 1) 678

Good point. Desalination typically does produce a lot of "gunk".

Even ones using old fashioned multistage evaporation still has large quantities of residue left.

We could take that plastic-filled residue and dump it in the nearest Marianas Trench, thus providing food for the next invading aliens, or we could just give up and pretend we can't do something with it.

Comment Re:No, the focus need to be on agriculture (Score 1) 678

No, grids work by power flow, and if you've ever driven along I-5 where most of the canal infrastructure is colocated with, you'd know that the high power lines go along that route too.

Used to be a power engineer. Studying for PhD in C&EE with focus on power systems.

A lot of Cali energy comes from as far away as BC. Used to provide it myself and helped set up the intertie disconnects at the borders as part of the Y2K/wildfire/quake safety prep.

Replace power in one place and you push fewer electrons in another place, power loss drops as fewer electrons pushed from low demand high supply area to high demand low supply area.

I'm working on multi-system integration of solar wind hydro and other systems, and use of biofuel shaping. Which is another can of worms, of course.

Desal is a good coastal solution, which the maps show could help, but you still have to pump it up. Good use for solar/wind (variable supplies can run pumps fairly well, with stop systems, to resupply reservoirs).

But ... have to fix the water demand part of the equation first, and the loss of water/soil that feeds that cycle. There's your big problem.

Comment Spectrum and diurnal clocks (Score 1) 52

Colors are really just spectral bands, UV and IR are just bands beyond human perception (caveat: not all humans, some can see a bit into the UV range).

In short, if you have things like SAD, increasing the spectra which penetrate in the morning (remember in the dawn the light goes through a large swath of atmosphere, not the small amount at noon) and adding those 1-2 hours before increases your internal body temperature in a manner similar to waking up due to daylight.

Yes, this works through eyelids (mostly transparent), so setting a clock to turn on high lumen lights (use a cheap timer) will wake you up and allow you to reset your body clock.

Comment Re: Why not? farmers (Score 1) 678

I prefer the farmers move out. Those assholes use 60% of the water.

Actually, there are some easy fixes to use less water.

1. Stop subsidizing agricultural water use.

2. Plant mixed crops (alternate rows) and plant cover crops between tree rows. Bonus: more soil retention, more water retention, easier to control pests.

3. Plant barrier trees around fields. Birds on those eat pests, Trees reduce soil loss, and water loss.

We learned this all in the 1970s in British Columbia, just north of Seattle. Adapt.

Comment Re:Rainwater collection (Score 1) 678

Usage is the major problem. Here in Seattle we use 1/4th as much water per capita as wasteful Californians do.

One fourth.

We actually grow plants that are suited for our local environment instead of lawns, we put green roofs on our buildings to slow down water loss and clean up rainwater and retain it, we don't subsidize crop water like California does.

Adapt. We already did. And growing grass is not adapting.

Comment Re:No, the focus need to be on agriculture (Score 1) 678

One would need a massive inland industrial solar facility to power a desalinator. Assuming such a facility could be built it might be better put to other uses. A far more practical plan would involve massive updating of water policy and watering techniques in California agriculture. That is where 80% of the water goes.

Or you could just put solar panels on top of your water canals, which would cut their evaporation to 1/10th, and provide power for desalination.

But that would work.

Slashdot Top Deals

One way to make your old car run better is to look up the price of a new model.

Working...