There is a "stopped" missing above...

What Hogan writes is pure rubbish. Serious photographers, even the ones using Adobe CC, knows full well that there is no such thing as The Cloud when it comes to professional photography. I am just a cheerful enthusiast who have longs since letting my 5D, 6D and GH4 blast though pictures. I try to make them, not fire and forget. Still, my Lightroom library is the neighborhood og 500GB these days. That's not going into the cloud and onto "all my devices.

Hogan should stop gulping down the cool aid and realize that Apple is slowly abandoning the market that once saved them, the creative professionals. Look at FCP. Look at Aperture. Creative professionals trusting their livelihood to Apple these days are suicidal nuts.Except for hardware of course. Apple knows hardware-

They have not. What they used to be friendly towards was the creative professional though. With FCP X and now Aperture, they are stating loud and clear that they are no longer interested in supporting the creative professionals, but would rather cater to the mass-market dummy. That isn't a bad business decision as such. Clearly FCP X is easier to use than previous versions of FCP, and it is priced accordingly. It is also probably going to sell tons more than did the original FCP. Mass-market at the expense of the ones that used to keep Apple alive, the creative professional.

With this new Apple attitude,if you are a creative professional, investing in Apple hardware or software would seem moronic and (professionally) suicidal.

Time for you meds again

When you "edit in" whatever it might be, Lightroom creates a TIFF file to edit, so RAW or no support for your camera is not an issue. You are covered, both on this issue and on the "cloud" issue.

I suggest you read the information about Photoshop CC again. Seriously. You are worried about something you need not worry about. That is, unless you're you "work in the field" with no internet connection for more than a month. Not a lot of us do.

Contrary to popular myth, the Adobe CC offering is a fantastic offering for most of Adobe's customers.

You need to see an optometrist.

Christ you are clueless.

Bullshit.

Just a slight correction: watching a movie at the theater will generally not give you better quality than Blu-Ray. In fact, when Bladerunner was released on BR it was probably the best quality it had ever been possible to watch it in.

You are right. Mum and dad cares about quality. Kids these days do not. They are happy with "HD" streaming (or ripped) at such terrible quality it makes dads eyes bleed. The young can't tell the difference between 480p and 1080p. Well, FUCK YOU ALL! Now the rest of us are going to have to be content with that shitty quality too. Just because kids today are too lazy to care about quality. Sorry morons, streaming HD and ripped HD is not HD. Not even close!

And you read /.? Seriously? Wow. Here, let me...

Read my first sentence once more.

Man you have a seriously literal mind. You wouldn't be Sheldon Cooper by any chance? Read some books not about geology or physics, perhaps a novel :-)

Good point, bad wording, but it was in the context of the idea of a benevolent creator or a nicely designed place for us to be, believed in general by the people subscribing to the most common religions and also by many environuts of the "Gaia is sacred" kind.

Yes, but that is not what happened. We discovered there was a lot more sand that we hadn't discovered.