Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Ad hominem doesn't help your case (Score 1) 824

Supporting prop 8 (i.e. supporting legislation that would remove equal rights from a particular group of people), is perfectly consistent with the definition of a bigot. It's name calling, but it's accurate name calling.

In a political debate, you may accuse the other side to fit the definition of "bigot" or "immoral" or "rearded" or "dork" or whatever, but that doesnt change a simple fact: rational political debates are about debating ideas, not name-calling people. Name-calling only serves to make the debate irrational. Do you really believe that it is mature to insult just because you think the insult is "accurate"? Most name callers think they're accurate; that doesn't make it OK.

I support the right of free association,[...]

No one if denying the legal right to free association. We are saying that demoting someone based on his personal, private political activity is anti-ethical.

One thing is to have a legal right, another thing is to be correct. You have the legal right to deny the Holocaust, or to claim that a person should be demoted from an technological organization because of his private political views. That doen't make it ethical.

Comment Ad hominem doesn't help your case (Score 1) 824

Supporting prop 8 makes you a bigot.

Ad hominem attacks don't help your case. Politics is supposed to be about which ideas make sense; its is not supposed to be about which side is better at name-calling.

I have yet to see a coeherent argument for why it is OK to fire or demote someone who disagrees with the institution of same-sex marriage, while it is not OK to fire someone for any other personal beliefs. Some people try to say "he is on the wrong side of a civil rights issue", but that is incoherent and inconsistent. If we allow whitch hunts when "it's about civil rights" then the powerful will simply define their pet causes to be civil rights issues.

Oh, so you support abortion? You want to deny the rights of the unborn. Fired!
Oh, so you support the death penalty? You want to deny the right to life of felons. Fired!
Oh, so you are against the independence of Quebec? You want to deny the right of political self-determination. Fired!

I, on the other hand, prefer that political, philosophical and religious speech should be free from punishment.

Comment Fire all pro-choicers! (Score 1) 824

You are speaking of a mere difference of opinion. If the boss actively campaigned to strip Republicans of their rights, then yes, it would be quite similar.

So pro-choice people should be fired, because they support stripping the rights of the unborn.
People who support the death penalty should be fired, because they support stripping the right to life of criminals.

Or maybe we shoundn't fire people because of their views.

Comment Punishing actions is different from punishing word (Score 1) 824

remember when the world blacklisted apartheid South Africa and its supporters? That was terrible wasn't it?

Punishing actions is radically different from punishing words. For example, it is understandable to boycott states with the death penalty. It is not OK to demand people to be fired or demoted merely because they support the death penalthy.

Ideas should be debated freely, without fear of retribution. People should express the ideas they believe in, not those ideas that will get them rewards (and refraim from expressing ideas that would be punished).

Businesses

Some Mozilla Employees Demand New CEO Step Down 824

_xeno_ (155264) writes "Mozilla recently named a new CEO, Brendan Eich, and as commentators in that article noted, there could be some backlash over his private contributions to political campaigns. Well, it turns out that they were correct, and despite a statement from Brendan Eich pledging to continue Mozilla's inclusiveness, some Mozilla employees are calling for him to step down. Should private beliefs be enough to prevent someone from heading a project they helped found?"
Medicine

Survey Finds Nearly 50% In US Believe In Medical Conspiracy Theories 395

cold fjord writes in with some bad news for the people using water fluoridation to pacify the public and install a new world government. "About half of American adults believe in at least one medical conspiracy theory, according to new survey results. (paywalled, first page viewable) Some conspiracy theories have much more traction than others ... three times as many people believe U.S. regulators prevent people from getting natural cures as believe that a U.S. spy agency infected a large number of African Americans with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). J. Eric Oliver, the study's lead author from University of Chicago, said people may believe in conspiracy theories because they're easier to understand than complex medical information. ... Some 49 percent of the survey participants agreed with at least one of the conspiracies. In fact, in addition to the 37 percent of respondents who fully agreed that U.S. regulators are suppressing access to natural cures, less than a third were willing to say they actively disagreed with the theory. — One of the conspiracy theories, that the U.S. created HIV, was created for an active disinformation campaign by the Soviet Union against the U.S. as a form of political warfare during the Cold War, and still gets repeated."

Comment No true scotsman (Score 1) 517

In other words, atheism and a policy of non-belief was a means to consolidate power. Weed out those that gather and foment discord and make them illegal.

Isn't that just the old "no true scotsman" fallacy?

Just like you argued that atheism can be a "means to consolidate power" without being intrinsically evil (it was just abused), Christians can argue the same for Christianity.

Comment Re:Unfair accusations (Score 1) 309

In many dioceses the Church also makes selling or giving away condoms a sin.

Condoms are still easy to find.
Anyway, this is analogous to (hypothetically) a vegan saying that selling meat is unethical.

It's not money and comfort, it's power that attracts many people to the priesthood. Power over parishioners in the case of the parish priest

What power does a parish priest have?

or really enormous power over the political process affecting the lives of millions when they reach the position of archbishop or cardinal.

Centuries ago, that would be credible. Today, it is inconsistent with the facts.

It is far easier and more effective to achieve power by getting elected as a politician.

Comment Unfair accusations (Score 1) 309

The pope didn't murder health workers. Pope John Paul II is however directly responsible for many dead people in Africa, by forbidding the use of condoms.

Forbid? You speak as if condoms were outlawed. The Church only "forbids" condoms in the sense that vegan literature "forbids" eating meat. It is up to individual choice.

All this in the name of a corrupt and inmensely rich institution that claims to bring the word of god.

You speak as if priests and bishops chose such lives seeking money and comfort. In fact, it is much more comfortable to live a secular life than it is to be a celibate priest.

Also, see
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/ni/2009/03/aids_expert_who_defended_the_p.html

Comment Re:There is no overpopulation (Score 1) 419

if "overpopulation" caused poverty, we would expect to see a negative correlation between population density and income per capita.

I meant this correlation with space, not time.
Comparing low-density countries with high-density countries, there is no correlation between income per capita and population density.

The correlation with time is actually positive, as population density and income per capita are growing together.

Comment Re:There is no overpopulation (Score 1) 419

Which begs the obvious question: Why do we need GMO to feed the world?

My post was about overpopulation, not GMO.

Which commodities would those be?

In my economics class, the professor showed a graph with the inflation-adjusted price of copper. It was stable for a century.
For electricity, a quick Google search shows the price has _fallen_ in the last 20 years.
http://inflationdata.com/articles/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Inflation-Adjusted-Electricity.jpg
For food, see figure 4 in
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R40545.pdf

> And how do you define "stable"?
I meant "stable" as "not oscillating too wildly and not showing a clear positive correlation with time". If it rises significantly in the long term, it is not stable.

but inflation itself is an instability in the system.

Inflation is not caused by "overpopulation", it is caused by the government printing too much money.

Fourth, there is no clear correlation between population density and income per capita.

How is income relevant?

if "overpopulation" caused poverty, we would expect to see a negative correlation between population density and income per capita.

World income per capita has grown even with the financial crisis:
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/xx.html
Unfortunately, in a quick Google, I did not find a historical graph.

We already invent pointless jobs for people, mostly in the public sector, because there isn't enough real honest work for everyone to do. That's in the first world, where we can afford more cruft. What happens in India and China, though, as mechanization replaces smallhold farming? What are a half-billion extra people, in each of them, going to do?

Human wants are insatiable. As simple things like food are mechanized, people will want more services such as (just one tiny example) live music.

Biotech

Augmented-Reality Contact Lens Prototype Coming To CES 38

schwit1 writes with news that one of the big presentations at next week's Consumer Electronics Show will be a set of contact lenses that are designed to augment a user's vision. A company called iOptik will be demonstrating a functioning prototype. The lenses themselves are actually only part of the display — they're paired with eyeglasses that are fitted with micro-projectors which generate the imagery shown on the lenses. "[B]y utilizing the specialized lenses to help users focus on both close and faraway objects — an issue when putting panoramic images inches from the eyes — in conjunction with the glasses to project the media and overlays, Innovega is able to do two things when most wearables do just one. First, it can project 'glance-able' displays, like Google Glass does exclusively where data is pushed to the periphery. But by utilizing the contact lenses with the glasses, it can also project a full-screen HUD, in other words operate in a heads-up display mode similar to what goggle wearables like the gaming-focused Oculus Rift offer. ... 'All the usual optics in the eyewear are taken away and there is a sub-millimeter lens right in the center,' [iOptik CEO Stephen Willey] explained. 'It's shaped, so the outside of the lens is shaped to your prescription if you need one and the very center of the lens is a bump that allows you to see incredibly well half an inch from your eye.' The second component involved is the optical filter that directs light. 'Light coming from outside the world is shunted to your normal prescription. Light from that very near display goes through the center of the lens, the optical filter,' Willey said."

Comment There is no overpopulation (Score 1) 419

I see this assertion time after time -- that we must feed 8, 10, 15 billions of people -- without asking the question, "Does the planet need that many people?"

There are many problems with your reasoning.
First, fertility rates are plummeting. Much of the world (including the USA) is already below replacement rate, leading to problems such as population aging and cultural weakening. Some countries still have large fertility rates, but even there it is falling fast. As a result, world population is projected by the UN to peak at 9B or maybe 10B, then start falling.

Second, much of the world is obese, and 1/3 of the food is not even eaten - it is thrown away at any of the several stages of production. Food production per capita is growing. Starvation is not caused by lack of food, it is caused by civil wars, terrorism, or corrupt, authoritarian and incompetent governments.

Third, inflation-adjusted price of many commodities have been stable for a century.

Fourth, there is no clear correlation between population density and income per capita.

Fifth: while we compete for primary resources (but see the third point above), when the population grows we share the benefits of more scientists, engineers, musicians, writers, philosophers, etc.

See
http://overpopulationisamyth.com/

Comment Re:Bad call (Score 1) 611

You are forgetting the Council of Nicea in 52 AD

You got the date totally wrong.

If you want to be a Christian today, you have to believe that Jesus is God or you're a heretic, period the end full stop fuck off.

What? No, you can believe that Jesus is not God, or that Jesus was purple with yellow dots, to your hearts content. No one will stop you.

Of course, the only place that Jesus claims a godhead is in the works of Saul

Read the Gospel of John.

And those books were written well after the others. So in fact, Jesus wasn't even God in early Christianity.

Non-sequitur; even if the works of Saul were indeed the only written source of the doctrine of Trinity, that doesn't mean early Christians did not believe in it, unless you hold the self-contradictory doctrine of radical Sola Scriptura.

Politics

US Justice Blocks Implementation of ACA Contraceptive Mandate 903

theodp writes "First approved for contraceptive use in the U.S. in 1960, 'The Pill' is currently used by more than 100 million women worldwide and by almost 12 million women in the U.S. But just hours before the Affordable Care Act was to go into effect, Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued a stay temporarily blocking a mandate requiring health insurance coverage of birth control, and gave the Obama administration until Friday to respond to the Supreme Court on the matter. Sotomayor's order applies to a group of nuns, the Little Sisters of the Poor, and other Roman Catholic nonprofit groups that use the same health plan, known as the Christian Brothers Employee Benefit Trust (PDF). The group is one of many challenging the federal requirement for contraceptive coverage, but a decision on the merits of that case by the full Supreme Court could have broader implications. One imagines Melinda Gates is none too pleased. So, will U.S. health care require a Department of Personal Belief Exemptions that are dictated by employers (PDF, 'The Trustees of CBEBT and the management of Christian Brothers Services are dedicated to protecting the employers participating in the CBEBT from having to face the choice of violating their faith or violating the law')?"

Slashdot Top Deals

Anyone can make an omelet with eggs. The trick is to make one with none.

Working...