You seem to be confusing storm surge and a big*ss rain cloud with sea Levels rising. A few mm of sea rise didn't flood Manhattan. Your underlying point may well be valid, but your supporting argument of it doesn't float.

It's not the fracking, its the wastewater. Simply prevent earthquakes by dumping the wastewater on the ground or the nearest river or kiddie pool. What could possibly go wrong?

The cafeteria The break room The watercooler A conference room, with catering A conference room, bring your own food.

Funded by taxpayers doesn't infer the taxpayer has open use of what they funded. The B2 was taxpayer funded, but I can't just walk onto a base and ask to fly one, or get plans to build my own and offer joy rides for my own profit. I know there are probably several large holes in my analogy; maybe a car analogy would be better?

I, for one, welcome our new Bovine Overlords. Without their primary predator, cattle will take over the world.

None of which matter in Google's general architecture. It's not like they're running a bunch of W2k8 RAID5 servers. Everything is massively redundant and replaceable.

I often need to be in 2 places at once. With this "service", now I can!

Because anyone would guess his bank account password matches the first 5 markers? Medical info, ok sorta, but otherwise I'm missing the privacy issue here that could be exploited. Then again: " From:pharmco... Re:your genetics... We see in your genes you are due to have "performance" issues soon. Order your v14gra today! "

1. Patent college football playoff system.
2. Sit on it so nobody else can.
3. Create the BCS.
4. PROFIT!

I don't see a merge as feasible in any way. The two RDBMSes have drastically different architectures. I could maybe see some moves toward common programming syntax, but a merge doesn't make technical sense.

So what do you do when the boss asks for data in a way the application didn't anticipate? Give me how many widgets we sold in June to evil inventors in the tri-state area, for example. I know I can do that relationally, and I know I can with cube-based DBs, but I've not understood how NoSQL systems handle the unexpected ad hoc needs, so I'm genuinely interested and not trolling.

You might want to look up the difference between a temple and the tabernacle before making yourself look as uninformed as you think the parent is. Parent post 1 - LK 0.

Oracle Licensing, is that you?

Source unknown: "Planes of the future will be completely automatic, with a pilot and a dog in the cockpit. The dog is there to make sure the pilot doesn't touch anything. The pilot is there to feed the dog."

I don't normally feed trolls, but OK. (Maybe you just hit reply on the wrong post?)

This was a pithy turn of phrase to point out that it is most often the educational community that emphasizes "Darwinism", rather than the scientific community arguing amongst itself.

I didn't say anything about creationism or my personal beliefs, let alone religious dogma. I think the summary (no I didn't RTFA) makes the point well that "Darwinism" and "evolution" are not equals. Darwin's work is part of the study of evolution, but is often presented as the entire concept. That's not poor science, that's poor education.

Since you brought it up... if you are right then, logically, sin does not exist so lying is irrelevant and neither moral nor immoral. If you're wrong then whoever you think you're arguing with would be correct and, therefore, not lying.