Oracle Licensing, is that you?

Source unknown: "Planes of the future will be completely automatic, with a pilot and a dog in the cockpit. The dog is there to make sure the pilot doesn't touch anything. The pilot is there to feed the dog."

I don't normally feed trolls, but OK. (Maybe you just hit reply on the wrong post?)

This was a pithy turn of phrase to point out that it is most often the educational community that emphasizes "Darwinism", rather than the scientific community arguing amongst itself.

I didn't say anything about creationism or my personal beliefs, let alone religious dogma. I think the summary (no I didn't RTFA) makes the point well that "Darwinism" and "evolution" are not equals. Darwin's work is part of the study of evolution, but is often presented as the entire concept. That's not poor science, that's poor education.

Since you brought it up... if you are right then, logically, sin does not exist so lying is irrelevant and neither moral nor immoral. If you're wrong then whoever you think you're arguing with would be correct and, therefore, not lying.

...educators have just ditto-headed Darwin rather than challenging and testing his ideas, or adding vast new knowledge.