Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:And this is a bad thing? (Score 1) 276

Not nearly as much. Average people have little to no power of large corporations.

You're so greedy you don't even realize it. If you don't like a corporation, don't buy their products. How do you think large corporations get so large?

I never said that such a system would be easily achieved. Due to the stupidity of much of the human race, it likely never will. I do, however, think it would be a good system.

Great. Everybody is an idiot except for you. I can't imagine why you're not getting more support...

Comment Re:And this is a bad thing? (Score 1) 276

My first point was referencing to the fact that giant corporations often exploit the average person in order to get richer

And average people exploit giant corporations every time they do business together. If they didn't think they were coming out ahead they wouldn't have done business with them.

My second point was referencing the fact that the rich are often able to lobby the government into doing their bidding

If society elects a government that sells them out to the rich, who's fault is that, really?

My third point was referencing the fact that often people will neglect to help others because the only way they believe that they can be helped is if they give them money.

And by getting rid of money you think they'll give something else? What's stopping them from giving something besides money right now?

I was more so talking about the system proposed by The Venus Project, sorry.

Good luck with that...

Comment Re:And this is a bad thing? (Score 1) 276

By only allowing those with worthless money (the people that don't have it don't necessarily not help society) to have possessions? By putting artificial limits on the amount of resources that could otherwise have been consumed? Odd.

That doesn't make any sense. If money is worthless then how did they use it to get possessions? Sounds worthwhile to me...

Second, if other people (aka society) really find those people helpful, then they (society) wouldn't mind voluntarily giving them money. The guy who fixes my car helps me out, so I give him money. The clerk at 7-11 helps me out, so I give him money. How is being a jobless bum helping me out? How is it helping anyone out?

Capitalism is convenient for the elite who want to get richer at the expense of everything else, convenient for corporations who want the government to do their bidding, and convenient for those with the power to help others in need to say "I can't help you, I don't have any money!"

Can you even explain what you mean or is it just mindless babble?

I also wasn't really talking about bartering at all.

I guess I don't really know what you're talking about then.

Comment Re:And this is a bad thing? (Score 1) 276

That is quite a stereotypical statement. Well done. I merely feel that money itself is (and especially will be in the future) useless, as it merely artificially limits the amount of resources that can be consumed. A society without money wouldn't necessarily let people leech off of their work for no good reason.

Wow.

Are you really claiming money limits resources? Are you sure it's not the other way around? Or do you honestly believe that I could grow an infinite amount of wheat and feed the world, but money is somehow limiting how much wheat I can grow? And in a world without money, we could produce an infinite number of cars, computers, houses, and everything, because none of the resources required to produce them would be limited by money, either? How would that work?

That's clearly ridiculous. Resources are limited. Scarcity is a fact. Money, prices, and the market system are just a method of dealing with scarcity.

Money is a medium exchange. It's easier to use than bartering. Can you imagine a software developer having to say, "I'll write some software for you in exchange for some of those apples you're growing?" And you'd have to do it everywhere you wanted to buy something. Interesting idea, but I think I'll stick with money.

As for leeching off society... money is convenient for doing that, too. If I walk into a store and say, "I want to buy a pound of apples, here's $5" the clerk doesn't have to look me up in a database to know I've done my fair share. Presumably I earned the $5 by providing something of value to somebody at some other time, but the store clerk doesn't have to worry about it. All he needs to know is that I have $5.

Comment Re:Too bad, it's a great conversion tool. (Score 1) 112

If you want to play games, buy a 360...

Comments like this kinda piss me off, because they make Linux users look like idiots.

If you want to brag about the size of your e-penis, and how you "only use linux," then more power to you.

But it's pretty ridiculous to basically tell other people, "Linux isn't good at that, so fuck you, you shouldn't use a computer for it."

I use Linux on all four of my computers at home. But do you know what I would do if I wanted to play a Windows game? I'd install Windows on one of them.

It's an operating system. Get over it.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Ninety percent of baseball is half mental." -- Yogi Berra

Working...