Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - Top-secret U.S. replica of Iran nuclear sites key to weapons deal (latimes.com)

Lasrick writes: Paul Richter at the LA Times has a very cool article describing replicas of Iran's nuclear facilities that the US operates in order to study what Iran's technical capabilities are. 'Using centrifuges acquired when Libya abandoned its nuclear program in 2003, as well as American-built equipment, the government has spent millions of dollars over more than a decade to build replicas of the enrichment facilities that are the pride of Iran's nuclear program.' Fascinating stuff.

Comment Re:Please stop. Just stop (Score 1) 1081

because their justice system isn't about revenge

Well, exactly! Where's the money in that?

Seriously though, you have the issue dead-to-rights here. If we want rehabilitation, there are known methods we could employ to make a considerable improvement to the recidivism statistics. Other countries have achieved results worth looking into.

That suggests revenge is of much more importance to society than an actual resolution to the problem.

We're taught that people who do 'bad things' are 'bad people'. There are precious few of us who develop into adults capable of questioning this. In time a little introspection can resolve this blurry question into a clear focus on the real issue: 'why do people do bad things?' Another angle suggests that 'people are not their behaviours'.

People behave the way they do through learned behaviour. Violent people are enacting learned behaviours that they perceive grant them a little short-term power for a medium-to-long-term loss that doesn't matter because it's not happening right now. Persistent short-term thinking is a hallmark of a being in 'survival mode'. They'll never prosper in this state, nor will they interact well with others.

We must see this for the inherently-correctable behavioural issue that it is, because the consequences otherwise are a steadily-inflating prison population and an ever-widening gap between the attitudes of the average citizen, the police enforcing the law and the judiciary meting out an acceptable form of justice.

Comment Treat them as you would passwords (Score 3, Funny) 1

The only way I've found to deal with these questions is to keep a few stock question/answer pairs in regular use. Presumably as competent computer users none of us are re-using any sensitive passwords, so we'll lose no significant security by using common q/a pairs. Examples:

  • - Your mother's maiden name: Brelph11ternkar1 (that's "brell-free-tern-carry")
  • - Make of your first car: innaw333ni3fudddg ("inner-weenie fudge")

Naturally, I'm lazy and let Chrome store the passwords. Google passwords can be changed very easily, even with a smartphone whilst shivering at night in your undergarments outside the door to your former accommodations. ;-)

Submission + - When Social Betrayal Breaks Your Logins 1

An anonymous reader writes: What do you do when the answers to your security questions are known by someone who dislikes you, such as a stalker or an ex-partner? It's getting hard to remember some of the more obscure factoids about my own life, like where I ate my first reuben sandwich, or things that might change over time, like my favorite TV show. Is it just me or is this a ridiculous security hole? Anyone have good suggestions for workarounds when I'm signing up for a new site?

Comment Re:It's easy in this case (Score 1) 255

You are right, sometimes decisions *do* need to be made to undo past fails. I think what the parent is suggesting is that these revisions of our current UIs be done with our UI history lessons front of mind.

We've known how to make a fairly decent UI for a while now, even Win7 is fairly intuitive (for varying definitions of 'intuitive'). Going back to Win '95-era UIs or doggedly pursuing a course of action because we've always done it that way is, as you say, not a solution but neither is it what was being suggested if I understand correctly.

Submission + - Senior Executive challenges

dave-man writes: The stories surrounding Hillary Clinton's use of e-mail while Secretary of State (such as this one http://www.washingtonpost.com/... ) have caused me to ponder the challenges associated with supporting senior people and just how oblivious they can be. Politics aside, comments like that in the article about "convenience" are not unique to Ms. Clinton. Senior executives in government and industry talk about things they should not in media they should not. While most readers of /. have multiple e-mail accounts on phones, tablets, and computers it seems to be "too hard" for some executives. Is this a UI problem? A training problem? An attention-span problem? Why do senior people do demonstrably stupid things?

Comment Re:Change you can believe in! (Score 1) 348

It always and only gets worse.

This is realism disguised as cynicism. We have the same situation in my own country.

Every English-speaking nation is suffering the same problem: those in power are terrible, those opposed are atrocious.

Perhaps it has always been this way but it has never been more visible.

Submission + - Mental Health Experts Seek to Block the Paths to Suicide

HughPickens.com writes: Experts and laymen have long assumed that people who died by suicide will ultimately do it even if temporarily deterred. Now Celia Watson Seupel reports at the NYT that a growing body of evidence challenges this view with many experts calling for a reconsideration of suicide-prevention strategies stressing “means restriction.” Instead of treating individual risk, means restriction entails modifying the environment by removing the means by which people usually die by suicide. The world cannot be made suicide-proof, of course. But, these researchers argue, if the walkway over a bridge is fenced off, a struggling college freshman cannot throw herself over the side. If parents leave guns in a locked safe, a teenage son cannot shoot himself if he suddenly decides life is hopeless.

Reducing the availability of highly lethal and commonly used suicide methods has been associated with declines in suicide rates of as much as 30%–50% in other countries (PDF). According to Cathy Barber, people trying to die by suicide tend to choose not the most effective method, but the one most at hand. Some methods have a case fatality rate as low as 1 or 2 percent,” says Barber. “With a gun, it’s closer to 85 or 90 percent. So it makes a difference what you’re reaching for in these low-planned or unplanned suicide attempts.” Ken Baldwin, who jumped from the Golden Gate Bridge in 1985 and lived, told reporters that he knew as soon as he had jumped that he had made a terrible mistake. "From the instant I saw my hand leave the railing, I knew I wanted to live. I was terrified out of my skull." Baldwin was lucky to survive the 220 foot plunge into frigid waters. Ms. Barber tells another story: On a friend’s very first day as an emergency room physician, a patient was wheeled in, a young man who had shot himself in a suicide attempt. “He was begging the doctors to save him,” she says. But they could not.

Comment Re:how much it took (Score 1) 274

I thought it was. Because with a tracking/aiming system every weapon can hit anything which is not fast enough to escape.

Well, I think now I'm doubly-confused because I didn't see anyone posting something that disagreed with this position of yours, nor was anyone positing an argument that in some way suggested that a sophisticated tracking system wouldn't be used, at least that I've seen. I guess I just don't quite see the link between what they were saying and what you appear to be countering with. :)

Comment Re:how much it took (Score 1) 274

So: hitting it with a laser without artificial aiming/tracking aids is impossible.

Sure, but that's not really the argument, is it? I may have missed something but I've never seen a laser system without sophisticated target tracking capabilities.

Hmm, think I might have already proven myself wrong with this 104KW polonium-210-powered laser rifle [PDF warning]. Think I've finally found what I want for my birthday!

Submission + - Red Hat strips down for Docker (computerworld.com.au)

angry tapir writes: Reacting to the surging popularity of the Docker virtualization technology, Red Hat has customized a version of its Linux distribution to run Docker containers. The Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Atomic Host strips away all the utilities residing in the stock distribution of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) that aren't needed to run Docker containers. Removing unneeded components saves on storage space, and reduces the time needed for updating and booting up. It also provides fewer potential entry points for attackers. (Product page is here.)

Comment Re:Jerri (Score 1) 533

I also suggest we have a Bank police that goes around tazing executives at random if we even think they are thinking of anything "clever"

Move to New Zealand! All our major banks are predatory Australian entities - with this as your political platform you'll be elected prime minister in no time.

Tasers to maximum!

Slashdot Top Deals

So you think that money is the root of all evil. Have you ever asked what is the root of money? -- Ayn Rand

Working...