Comment Re:This reminds me of a great Simpsons episode (Score 1) 625
An EXTREME case would be when someone is bid-ridden.
What's that? Too much eBay?
An EXTREME case would be when someone is bid-ridden.
What's that? Too much eBay?
Any article/interview from Bruce Perens can be summed up thusly:
"Bruce Perens, who loves Bruce Perens, thinks that Bruce Perens Bruce Perens Bruce Perens Bruce Perens, and also Bruce Perens. Of course, Bruce Perens also thinks Bruce Perens is so Bruce Perens that Bruce Perens Bruce Perens.
Signed: Bruce Perens"
To be fair, the guy is often interesting if you ignore his personality. But he's SO conceited and full of himself, I have a hard time divorcing the message and the messenger.
The easiest way to eliminate this threat is to lock down hardware sampling rates such that ultrasonic frequencies cannot be reliably reproduced
Nope. The easiest way to eliminate this threat is to keep a pet bat next to your computer to scramble any ultrasonic transmission.
Net neutrality is the idea that data from any provider (rich or poor, powerful company or a single guy, corrupt or honest) is treated the same way on the network.
Cisco's comment concerns the prioritization of data depending on its type. I see nothing wrong with that.
If Snowden hadn't been treated like a traitor by his country, he wouldn't've had to flee in the first place. Uncle Sam only have himself to blame if snowden is spilling the beans in Russia.
TVs have no business being on the internet, much less downloading stuff from Facebook. A TV is for watching television. How did we do it up to now, without the internet? Gee...
Someone wanted to deliver content via webserver and then sue people who received this delivery as violating copyright?
Amazing.
They seem to be saying that, in addition to displaying the content on your screen, your browser also writes a copy into its cache, and that's two copies.
I wonder what they'd say of, say, a RAID1 file system, which makes two copies of the cached page, on two different disks. Would that mean two violations of the copyright? And if, after sending it from the screen to your eyes, the information in your brain is a third violation?
It's even worse. From the copy on the screen, each of your eyes makes another copy on its retina.
And on the technical side, all the routers temporarily put the data into a buffer. So it causes one extra copyright infringement for every router the data passes.
and needs swapping and "charging" in a factory sounds very much like a non-rechargeable battery.
With that concept, you could very easily have electric cars powered with a very large number of alcaline batteries, and "charging stations" in which you change the alcaline batteries.
The car grinding to a halt would be a pretty efficient warning.
And the global dictatorship is slowly being pieced together.
And citizens do nothing, amazingly. People with any knowledge of history should be scared shitless - I know I am.
And soon it'll be too late to do anything about it...
Isn't it exactly how Rimmer and the entire crew died? Old news...
Better, faster ways to access inept content.
Exactly. If you fill out a form to ask Google to forget about you, all that'll happen, most likely, is that Google will have another piece of information about you - that you don't want information about you to be made public.
Sure they'll remove stuff about your from their search results, but rest assured *they* won't erase anything. Information on people is much too valuable to waste, just because something as trivial as the law says they must delete it.
Who's gonna check that they complied eh? Is that even possible?
It's nowhere to be found in Genesis.
Did they also calculate how much energy would be saved if we would not waste processor power on DRM decoding?
Serving coffee on aircraft causes turbulence.
