"U.S. Patent No. 5,946,647 on a "system and method for performing an action on a structure in computer-generated data" (in its complaint, Apple provides examples such as the recognition of "phone numbers, post-office addresses and dates" and the ability to perform "related actions with that data"; one example is that "the system may receive data that includes a phone number, highlight it for a user, and then, in response to a user's interaction with the highlighted text, offer the user the choice of making a phone call to the number")"
Well... there goes Regular Expressions since that's what is used to make those types of "recognition" systems. But, you could also apply this patent to Arrays in C++ (or any programming language for that matter) since they did talk about "structures" and an Array is a data "structure." But last time I checked, the concept of Arrays have been around for more than 20 years. Yeah, that patent is invalid.
"U.S. Patent No. 6,343,263 on a "real-time signal processing system for serially transmitted data" (while this sounds like a pure hardware patent, there are various references in it to logical connections, drivers, programs; in its complaint, Apple said that this patent "relates generally to providing programming abstraction layers for real-time processing applications")"
You could in theory apply this patent to any kind of radio transceiver be it a cell phone or *gasp* a television. Oops, yeah... that patent too is invalid.