Indeed, but that's not a point you made.
How did you quote me making it then? I am merely supplementing my original points which still stand.
I believe that laws have been passed by a legitimately elected government that make it a crime.
That's very interesting, but that doesn't my question; I wasn't discussing the rights and wrongs of the licence, only the facts concerning it. You agree it is a crime. That's all I wanted to know, because you also said
No. You'll pay a fine. The government won't even prosecute you. |it will be a private prosecution by TV Licensing.
which is ambiguous as to whether it's a crime or not. I'm sorry I misinterpreted you.
Let me repeat: I was only concerned with the statement made earlier, not by you, that
the government is not involved in the collection of the license [sic] fee
The poster who wrote that has had the good sense not to argue with me. Let me make it clear for you: the licence fee is a tax which right now is mandated by the Communications Act 2003. How is the Government *not* more intimately involved in the collection of the licence fee than, say, when you agree to pay for groceries at the supermarket?