I hope this makes people think twice before filing a forget-me request. It ensures they'll be remembered.
Perhaps you'll be the victim of slander and lose your career over a lie that is interesting enough to go viral where your vindication isn't and doesn't.
They're the most current available...
2) Never feel and "loyalty" to a company or boss- they won't hesitate to kick you to the curb
I've seen managers cry because they had to fire people. I'm inclined to agree though, but more in terms of "take care of yourself first".
Just curious; in what business did you start in? IT probably, but what specific sector? Sysadmin, web scripting, telecom, etc? And has there been a time you'd rather have a salary?
I'm making the step from salaried man to freelancing soon, and I'm mighty curious.
(Ben je Nederlands?)
Im a contractor, (...) At my current employer, I've been at one location for 2 years.
That's interesting... don't you feel more like an employee rather than a freelancer?
You don't fix bad data with software. You just express how you're going to make due with what you have.
Because some people like their laptops as small and thin as possible, there's always demand for the next best, smallest but fastest thing.
You carry personal computers everywhere you go. It's not a matter of capacity, but collective will.
The planet where the elite want you to talk about chasing the wrong dream, and I'm fighting against that influence in every debate on this subject.
Am I the only one who thinks this is cool as hell, and wants this made open access for all?
Why is it ALWAYS with the fear mongering about the privacy you already don't have, and no one ever talks about the better decisions we could be making if everyone knew what the elite already know?
Sensor networks are interesting for their potential to tell us things we'd never think to ask. About ourselves.
Quit trying to hide like cowards and chase the power to watch the watchers, you mis'rble bastards!
No, it's not rocket science. And if it worked now, it would be okay. But it doesn't. I ran through all the steps, and the simulator starts but it's not the x86 emulator for some reason.
"Just set it up" isn't as easy as you make it out to be. I just tried it in Android Studio.
First, you have to install a 3rd party kernel extension (from Intel). Then you have to configure an AVD with the new x86 value for the CPU/ABI field. It didn't appear for some reason for my target "Android 4.4.2". After looking around, I found another download in the Android SDK Manager called "Intel x86 Atom System Image", let's download that. The documentation mentions this, but I glossed over it. OK, back to the AVD manager and create a virtual device.
Now I finish it, and run the app. Running the app takes 39 seconds, as Grails reports (about 5 seconds, if that, on Xcode for the iOS port of our project). It asks where I want to run it, pick the new AVD and click Run. It starts Android but not the app.
Weird. OK, so I run it again with the simulator running. The option "choose a running device" cannot be selected. That's strange. I pick the new AVD again and unfortunately, it starts another copy. Shit. I let it boot but notice it's really slow as usual -- ten minutes later it's still booting. I check the already running copy and click around. Slow as hell as well. Apparently it's not accelerated at all!
At this point, I'm ready to give up and go back to testing on a device again.
The above is tested on a 2013 MacBook Air with 8 gigs of memory.
I used to buy cheap chargers but after reading this article, I changed my mind: www.righto.com/2012/03/inside-cheap-phone-charger-and-why-you.html
All that rancor and hatred. With so many excellent browsers out there, it's hard to understand why people draw their energy from the Dark Side.
I don't get it. I love the release schedule. Always the latest and greatest. And in my opinion, it just keeps improving. I like the new interface as well, looks slick and keeps the chrome to a minimum.
Challenge Accepted!!
They want to allow people to be reassured that they have "enough" privacy by giving them tools that will protect them from other end users learning their secrets, whatever they've decided those secrets should be.
Their saleable advantage is that they can let people manipulate you. They've been using mass analysis of mail as a way to better do that since their mail services were invite only.
They want you to be satisfied with them not just invading your privacy, not just manipulating you with what they learn, but manipulating you for anyone who wants to pay.
But don't worry, your data is secure in transit!
You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred. -- Superchicken
