No. In fact the US/ROK military has had a problem (at least into the 1980s) with their human-detecting radar alerting on Manchurian cranes in the DMZ. Any moving creature big enough to register at all, registers as "target".

It's also probably not good public policy to pay a fire department on a per fire basis.

Are you suggesting that there might suddenly be more fires, if the fire department got paid per-fire? How odd!

There's no reason that one should have a choice.

Sure they should have a choice, but I expect that their homeowner's insurance should also be more than $75 higher if they don't have fire-department coverage.

MySpace was mostly popular among young people, particularly teenagers.

MySpace was mostly popular among blind people. There is no other possible explanation for the "design" of users' pages.

Also, all this means is that Greenland and West Antarctica are contributing less than 1/4 of the annual rise in sea levels rather than accounting for more than half. I guess we have to keep looking to find where the rest of the rise is coming from.

Unless a "rebounding crust" can also cause sea-level rise?

That advice would have been really useful before he invested several years and tens of thousands of dollars getting a Comp Sci degree.

> It's the large industrial hemp growers that are growing the good quality pot, driving the price down, Are you sure that this is not an issue of confusing terminology? Maybe the complaint is about "industrial hemp growers" as in "large-scale growers of high-THC hemp, who use industrial-farming practices". That is different from "growers of industrial-hemp", a different strain of the plant that has almost no THC.

If you have a Mossberg, you don't need the NYT to help keep kids off your lawn.

But these claims do not constitute a bomb threat. We have evidence that bombs exist. This is more like you are running the airport and someone calls in an "angry, rampaging. leprechaun threat". Would you order the evacuation of the terminal? If so, how would you later explain this to your boss?.

> Well, once you start living in houseboats, you need to move all your prisoners to prison boats.

You must not be familiar with "Compassionate Conservatism(tm)". We don't have to move prisoners to prison boats. This is called, "solving a problem with a problem."

For those who haven't seen this quote:

There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.

We don't hold the car manufacturer liable for the existence of car thieves, why is Microsoft liable for the existence of bot-herders?

If Ford touted the security of their cars, but tapping "shave and a haircut" on the driver's window of any Ford unlocked the car, started the engine, and disabled any installed LoJacks, I could see a lawsuit.

This just in: physicists have a pro-gravity bias. Geologists have an anti-flat-earth bias. Astronomers have a pro-heliocentric bias.

I'm waiting for the amphibious "VW Go Fish!". It's a good thing they don't make firetrucks: "VW Chutes and Ladders". This thread could get quite long (and progressively silly).

Why would you compare perfectly honorable Heathens to Microsoft shills?