Try out Alfresco, It is a nice document management system if you are familiar with IT-system.

I have this problem on a HP desktop-machine with Nvidia-graphics. It does not appear om My thinkpad X220 with intel graphics.

It's because we pull a fiber in to the living room. I have 100 Mbps that way. 200 SEK/month

;) I have a lot of Linux systems migrating from Debian version to Debian version without a lot of time and effort. That has been going on since 1995 and is the reason that we don't like to deploy on windows.

No, the market has done what it should.

Expensive and proprietary?

Free and Free?

Which would the market choose?

Actually, it is patents that prevents people finding better and cheaper solutions, as we can see in the software industry now.

No, Linux does not contain any Microsoft Intellectual property.

If you continue to maintain that view, please present some evidence in favor of that. Microsoft has not succeded with that.

I do not say that copyright in not relevant. I say that it is made for the 19th century when we didn't have digital culture.

I am not saying that it is doing better, I say that they try to take all the profit from the new technique.

It is a silly system because the copyright laws are made for the 19th century. What happens when people copy is that business is hit, which is fine for me. It is not to support a media industry that is the goal of the copyright laws.

We have now a system for cheap and rapid distribution of digital media, and the problem is that the media industry want to take all the profit from that. The obvious answer to that would be that the market forced them to lower the prices, but it doesnt work. The industry is using their monopoly to raise their margins instead of lowering the prices. As long as they do that, they will need laws and police to hunt those that try to escape the monopoly.

The politicians need to rework the copyright laws or deal with the media industry abuse of their monopoly. Lobbying has so far prevented our representatives do represent us.

Microsoft realised that MSN was dead before its release and licensed Spyglass Mosaic as a quick Fix. They had the idea to lock users in to their own network and provide services for pay. When Internnet took off, they wondered where their customers went. Wikipedia writes " Open access to the World Wide Web was not originally included in the classic MSN service at the time of its initial launch, but Internet access was quickly offered through Microsoft's Internet Explorer web browser, which was available as a download from the MSN service or as part of the Windows 95 Plus! package"

I don't find it strange that 1.0 is good. Microsoft was caught without a browser when they realized that no one wanted MSN. So they bought Spyglass Mosaic which was a good browser, but they didn't have the time to ruin it before the release. Curiosly, I was one of the first 10 000 that downloaded it and was rewarded with a T-shirt.

Obviously it is a hoax. How can anybody claim that 101 degrees Celsius is cold?

I agree that this is a danger with the cloud in general, but in this case, it was Amazon that kicked out a customer and in this discussion we talk about Amazons new "reliable" service.

I wont touch them anymore.